Development of the heat flow cone penetration test (HF-CPT)

Authors

  • Leon Vrielink Fugro, The Netherlands
  • Nico Parasie Fugro, The Netherlands
  • Joek Peuchen Fugro, The Netherlands
  • Alexandros Daniilidis Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
  • Philip J. Vardon Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59490/seg.2023.606

Abstract

The heat flow cone penetration test (HF-CPT) provides in-situ values of thermal conductivity (patent pending). The HF-CPT test records include (1) heat flow (HF) measurements acquired by a CPT add-on module, i.e. heating power and temperature versus time and (2) cone penetration test (CPT) measurements, i.e. cone resistance, sleeve friction and pore pressure versus depth and time. The test method requires a short interruption of the continuous CPT penetration phase, to allow stationary HF heating and cooling cycles.

Values of thermal conductivity are derived similarly to the principles for laboratory thermal needle probes described in common ASTM standards, particularly [1].

Data processing makes use of an advanced interpretation method that accounts for the short-cylinder effects of the HF module and short timeframe heat fluxes. The novel interpretation method includes inversion of a numerical forward model of the interaction between the heat flow module and the surrounding soil. The interpretation method also integrates standard CPT results, such that both a semi-continuous thermal conductivity profile and a continuous standard CPT profile are obtained.

Validation of the interpretation method included comparison of thermal conductivity values derived from other test methods, notably laboratory transient plane source tests [1], in-situ thermal needle probe tests (based on [2]) and thermal cone penetration tests [3]. Figure 1 presents an example of validation results for predominantly clay soil. The results are seen to closely match those derived from an in-situ needle probe. As the HF-CPT measurements were taken two metres apart horizontally from the in-situ needle probe measurements, some deviation between the results is to be expected due to heterogeneity of the soil.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-03

How to Cite

Vrielink, L., Parasie, N., Peuchen, J., Daniilidis, A., & Vardon, P. J. (2023). Development of the heat flow cone penetration test (HF-CPT). Symposium on Energy Geotechnics 2023, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.59490/seg.2023.606

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Offshore geotechnics