Driving Public Values through LinkedIn
Insights from the EU Digital & Tech Account
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.996Keywords:
Public Sector Communication, Public Values, Transparency, Inclusivity, LinkedIn, Stakeholder Engagement, Social Media Strategy, Policy Communication, Professional NetworkingAbstract
As digital transformation progresses, platforms such as LinkedIn present unique opportunities for professional engagement in public governance and sustaining public values, yet their potential remains underexplored. This study analyses the communication practices of the EU Digital & Tech LinkedIn account – a channel for promoting Europe's digital transformation initiatives led by the European Commission. By analyzing 159 posts with their engagement metrics and user comments over a six-month period in 2024, we identified key patterns in content type, sentiment, and thematic focus. Informational posts dominate the account's feed, with an emphasis on topics such as artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and data governance. These posts generate the highest interaction scores, reflecting LinkedIn's suitability for professional and policy-driven discussions and reinforcing the platform's value in generating thoughtful, substantive exchanges. LinkedIn is likely to promote public values such as transparency, inclusivity, and collaboration effectively when communication strategies prioritize detailed content and meaningful stakeholder interaction. However, the analysis also reveals missed opportunities for direct engagement, such as responding to user comments, posing open-ended questions, or leveraging other interactive features like polls or events, possibly allowing users to take on more active roles as prosumers. By embracing more participatory formats, public sector accounts could foster richer interaction and co-ownership of policy narratives. Ultimately, we underscore LinkedIn's underused potential as a dynamic platform for collaborative innovation in digital public governance, offering actionable insights into how communication strategies can strengthen trust, responsiveness, and legitimacy in the public sector.
Downloads
References
Bartosik-Purgat, M., & Filimon, N. (2022). European Consumers in the Digital Era: Implications of Technology, Media and Culture on Consumer Behavior (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003263685
Batrinca, B., & Treleaven, P. C. (2015). Social media analytics: A survey of techniques, tools and platforms. AI & SOCIETY, 30(1), 89–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-014-0549-4
Boulianne, S. (2019). Building Faith in Democracy: Deliberative Events, Political Trust and Efficacy. Political Studies, 67(1), 4–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718761466
Chen, Y.-C., Ahn, M. J., & Wang, Y.-F. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Public Values: Value Impacts and Governance in the Public Sector. Sustainability, 15(6), 4796. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064796
Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2013). Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, J., Wolff, H.-G., Forret, M. L., & Sullivan, S. E. (2020). Networking via LinkedIn: An examination of usage and career benefits. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118, 103396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103396
Du, X., Yin, H., Chen, L., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., & Zhou, X. (2020). Personalized Video Recommendation Using Rich Contents from Videos. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 32(3), 492–505. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2018.2885520
Edney, S., Looyestyn, J., Ryan, J., Kernot, J., & Maher, C. (2018). Posts, pics, or polls? Which post type generates the greatest engagement in a Facebook physical activity intervention? Translational Behavioral Medicine, 8(6), 953–957. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/iby006
Egger, R., & Gokce, E. (2022). Natural Language Processing (NLP): An Introduction. In R. Egger (Ed.), Applied Data Science in Tourism: Interdisciplinary Approaches, Methodologies, and Applications (pp. 307–334). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88389-8_15
European Commission. (2024a). Digital transition—European Commission. [link]
European Commission. (2024b). Post | Feed | LinkedIn [LinkedIn Post]. EU Digital & Tech Page. [link]
European Commission. (2025a). EU Digital & Tech: Posts | LinkedIn [Linkedin Profile]. [link]
European Commission. (2025b). European Commission: Posts | LinkedIn [Linkedin Profile]. [link]
ExplosionAI GmbH. (2024). Trained Models & Pipelines · spaCy Models Documentation. Trained Models & Pipelines. [link]
Faber, B. (2022). Platforms as distinctive realms and the role of policy discretion: A cross-platform assessment of citizen engagement with Dutch municipalities through Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram. Local Government Studies, 48(5), 973–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.2007081
Gestel, N. van, & Grotenbreg, S. (2021). Collaborative governance and innovation in public services settings. Policy & Politics, 49(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16123785900606
Gilardi, F., Gessler, T., Kubli, M., & Müller, S. (2022). Social Media and Political Agenda Setting. Political Communication, 39(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390
Graziano, E. A., Fattobene, L., Giovando, G., & Pellicelli, A. (2023). Contacts on LinkedIn: Equity crowdfunding platforms' networks and creators' innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(7), 2351–2372. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2022-0125
Grewal, D., Herhausen, D., Ludwig, S., & Villarroel Ordenes, F. (2022). The Future of Digital Communication Research: Considering Dynamics and Multimodality. Journal of Retailing, 98(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2021.01.007
Haro-de-Rosario, A., Sáez-Martín, A., & del Carmen Caba-Pérez, M. (2018). Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government: Twitter or Facebook? New Media & Society, 20(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816645652
Keraghel, I., Morbieu, S., & Nadif, M. (2024). Recent Advances in Named Entity Recognition: A Comprehensive Survey and Comparative Study (No. arXiv:2401.10825). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.10825
Lai, C.-H., & Fu, J. S. (2020). Organizations' Dialogic Social Media Use and Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder Targeting and Message Framing. International Journal of Communication, 14(0), Article 0.
Lewandowsky, M., & Siri, J. (2023). Populismus und Digitalisierung. In N. Kersting, J. Radtke, & S. Baringhorst (Eds.), Handbuch Digitalisierung und politische Beteiligung (pp. 1–16). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31480-4_53-1
LinkedIn Ireland Unlimited Company. (2016). About LinkedIn. [link]
Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, Community, and Action: How Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media*. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
Macnamara, J., & Zerfass, A. (2012). Social Media Communication in Organizations: The Challenges of Balancing Openness, Strategy, and Management. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 6(4), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2012.711402
Mergel, I. (2012). Social Media in the Public Sector: A Guide to Participation, Collaboration and Transparency in The Networked World. John Wiley & Sons.
Milakovich, M. E. (2021, September 27). Digital Governance | Applying Advanced Technologies to Improve Public. [link]
Muniz-Rodriguez, K., Ofori, S. K., Bayliss, L. C., Schwind, J. S., Diallo, K., Liu, M., Yin, J., Chowell, G., & Fung, I. C.-H. (2020). Social Media Use in Emergency Response to Natural Disasters: A Systematic Review With a Public Health Perspective. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 14(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.3
NLTK Project. (2024). NLTK :: Natural Language Toolkit. [link]
Olteanu, A., Kıcıman, E., & Castillo, C. (2018). A Critical Review of Online Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries. Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 785–786. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159652.3162004
Ostrowski, D. A. (2015). Using latent dirichlet allocation for topic modelling in twitter. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Semantic Computing (IEEE ICSC 2015), 493–497. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOSC.2015.7050858
Özdemir, S. F., Graneng, K., & De Wilde, P. (2025). EU executives on social media: Assessing the potential and trajectories of legitimation via public communication on Twitter. European Union Politics, 14651165251320881. https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165251320881
Perriam, J., Birkbak, A., & Freeman, A. (2020). Digital methods in a post-API environment. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(3), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1682840
Pradha, S., Halgamuge, M. N., & Tran Quoc Vinh, N. (2019). Effective Text Data Preprocessing Technique for Sentiment Analysis in Social Media Data. 2019 11th International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering (KSE), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/KSE.2019.8919368
Rauchfleisch, A., Kao, J.-J., Tseng, T.-H., Ho, C.-T., & Li, L.-Y. (2023). Maximizing Science Outreach on Facebook: An Analysis of Scientists' Communication Strategies in Taiwan. Media and Communication, 11(1), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6080
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3. ed). Free Press [u.a.].
Rus, M., Tasente, T., & Camara, V. (2021). Social Media Communication of Public Institutions. Case Study: Representation of the European Commission in Romania. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 17, 119.
Thelwall, M. (2018). Social media analytics for YouTube comments: Potential and limitations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1381821
Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The Process of Technology Innovation. Lexington Books. United Nations. (2025). United Nations: Overview | LinkedIn [Linkedin Profile]. [link]
U.S. DOS. (2025). U.S. Department of State: Overview | LinkedIn [Linkedin Profile]. [link]
Valenzuela, S., Halpern, D., Katz, J. E., & Miranda, J. P. (2019). The Paradox of Participation Versus Misinformation: Social Media, Political Engagement, and the Spread of Misinformation. Digital Journalism, 7(6), 802–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623701
Wang, Y., Hao, H., & Platt, L. S. (2021). Examining risk and crisis communications of government agencies and stakeholders during early-stages of COVID-19 on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106568
Wukich, C. (2020). More Monitoring, Less Coordination: Twitter and Facebook Use between Emergency Management Agencies. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2020-0007
Wukich, C. (2021). Government Social Media Engagement Strategies and Public Roles. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(1), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1851266
Zavattaro, S. M., French, P. E., & Mohanty, S. D. (2015). A sentiment analysis of U.S. local government tweets: The connection between tone and citizen involvement. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.003
Zerres, C. (Ed.). (2024). Handbuch Social-Media-Marketing. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-45784-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lukas Weller, Stanislav Mahula, Joep Crompvoets
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
