Collaborative Governance for the Construction of Public Policies on Social Sustainability

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.992

Keywords:

collaborative governance, social sustainability, decision-making, public policy, governance strategies, collaboration

Abstract

Government actors promoting collaborative initiatives for a more inclusive and democratic society must understand that effective strategies for lasting social impact demand significant effort. Collaborative governance relies on the interaction between the government, private sector, and civil society. However, success is not guaranteed by collaboration alone, due to various factors can affect decision-making effectiveness. This article explores the key factors in collaborative governance, with a specific focus on social sustainability, to optimize governance practices. The field research was conducted using a qualitative approach through a case study in Porto Alegre city, Brazil. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 stakeholders, analysed documents, and performed direct observations. The study provides valuable insights for public managers and governments on effective strategies for addressing social issues and improving governance, aiming to enhance social sustainability and project efficiency. Additionally, it identifies factors for collaborative governance in the Latin America context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almeida, V., Getschko, D., & Afonso, C. (2015). The origin and evolution of multistakeholder models. IEEE Internet Computing, 19(1), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2015.15

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Bardin, L. (2009). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(2), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Beck, D., & Ferasso, M. (2023). Bridging ‘stakeholder value creation’ and ‘urban sustainability’: The need for better integrating the environmental dimension. Sustainable Cities and Society, 89, 104316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104316

Bianchi, C., Nasi, G., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2021). Implementing collaborative governance: Models, experiences, and challenges. Public Management Review, 23(11), 1581–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1795231

Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Dudley, N., Jaeger, T., Lassen, B., Pathak Broome, N., Phillips, A., & Sandwith, T. (2013). Governance of protected areas: From understanding to action. IUCN. [link]

Bradley, S., Mahmoud, I. H., & Arlati, A. (2022). Integrated collaborative governance approaches towards urban transformation: Experiences from the Clever Cities project. Sustainability, 14(23), 15566. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315566

Broccardo, L., Culasso, F., & Mauro, S. G. (2019). Smart city governance: Exploring the institutional work of multiple actors towards collaboration. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(4), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2018-0126

Buchan, P. M., Orchel, K. O., Lannin, A., Brett, E., Willis, M., Holtby, R., & Walker, R. (2024). Opportunities for improved social sustainability in marine governance. University of Exeter and Marine Management Organisation.

Burden, B. C., Canon, D. T., Mayer, K. R., & Moynihan, D. P. (2012). The effect of administrative burden on bureaucratic perception of policies: Evidence from election administration. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 741–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02600.x

Casti, J. L. (1986). On system complexity: Identification, measurement, and management. In J. L. Casti & A. Karlqvist (Eds.), Complexity, language, and life: Mathematical approaches (pp. 146–173). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70941-1_6

Cepeda, G., & Martin, D. (2005). A review of case studies publishing in Management Decision 2003–2004: Guides and criteria for achieving quality in qualitative research. Management Decision, 43(6), 851–876. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510603600

Choi, T., & Robertson, P. J. (2014a). Caucuses in collaborative governance: Modeling the effects of structure, power, and problem complexity. International Public Management Journal, 17(2), 224–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.905398

Choi, T., & Robertson, P. J. (2014b). Deliberation and decision in collaborative governance: A simulation of approaches to mitigate power imbalance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut003

Criado, J. I., & Guevara-Gómez, A. (2021). Public sector, open innovation, and collaborative governance in lockdown times: A research of Spanish cases during the COVID-19 crisis. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(4), 612–626. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2020-0242

Davidson, M. (2010). Social sustainability and the city. Geography Compass, 4(7), 872–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x

Eckerberg, K., Bjärstig, T., & Zachrisson, A. (2015). Incentives for collaborative governance: Top-down and bottom-up initiatives in the Swedish mountain region. Mountain Research and Development, 35(3), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00068.1

Edmunds, D., & Wollenberg, E. (2001). A strategic approach to multistakeholder negotiations. Development and Change, 32(2), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00202

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Ferrarezi, E., & Oliveira, C. G. (2012). Reflexões sobre a emergência da participação social na agenda das políticas públicas: Desafios à forma de organização burocrática do Estado. In V Congresso CONSAD de Gestão Pública (pp. 8–11). CONSAD.

Fischer, M., & Sciarini, P. (2016). Drivers of collaboration in political decision making: A cross-sector perspective. Journal of Politics, 78(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1086/683061

Flick, U. (2009). Desenho da pesquisa qualitativa. Artmed.

Follador, D., Roy, M., & Bélanger, A. (2021). Collaborative governance in urban planning: Patterns of interaction in Curitiba and Montreal. Journal of Planning and Development, 147(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000642

Fontanella, B. J. B., Ricas, J., & Turato, E. R. (2008). Amostragem por saturação em pesquisas qualitativas em saúde: Contribuições teóricas. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 24(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2008000100003

Gontijo, A. C., & Maia, C. S. C. (2004). Tomada de decisão, do modelo racional ao comportamental: Uma síntese teórica. Caderno de Pesquisa em Administração, 11(4), 13–30. [link]

Gutberlet, J., Besen, G. R., & Morais, L. P. (2020). Participatory solid waste governance and the role of social and solidarity economy: Experiences from São Paulo, Brazil. Detritus, 13, 167–180. https://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2020.14024

Hovardas, T. (2021). Social sustainability as social learning: Insights from multi-stakeholder environmental governance. Sustainability, 13(14), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147744

Kossmann, C. M. (2015). Collaborative governance in the Nusa Penida Marine Protected Area, Indonesia (Master’s thesis). Wageningen University and Research Centre. [link]

Kossmann, C. M., Behagel, J. H., & Bailey, M. (2016). Action and inertia in collaborative governance. Marine Policy, 72, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.007

Liu, F., & Maitlis, S. (2010). Nonparticipant observation. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (Vol. 2, pp. 609–611). SAGE.

Maani, K. (2016). Multi-stakeholder decision making for complex problems: A systems thinking approach with cases.

World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9294

Martins, G. A. (2008). Estudo de caso: Uma reflexão sobre a aplicabilidade em pesquisa no Brasil. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 2(2), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.11606/rco.v2i2.34702

Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J., & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2019). Bureaucracy and the failure of politics: Challenges to democratic governance. Administration and Society, 51(10), 1576–1605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719874759

Mosley, J. E., & Wong, J. (2021). Decision-making in collaborative governance networks: Pathways to input and throughput legitimacy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(2), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa033

Naffaa, S. (2017). Collaborative modelling in Deltares. Deltares. [link]

Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., Kochskämper, E., & Adzersen, A. (2017). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12209

Panday, P. (2018). Making innovations work: Local government-NGO partnership and collaborative governance in rural Bangladesh. Development in Practice, 28(1), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2018.1401588

Pashaei Kamali, F., Meuwissen, M. P. M., & Oude Lansink, A. G. J. M. (2018). Towards social sustainability: Screening potential social and governance issues for biojet fuel supply chains in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 92, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.078

Picavet, M. E. B., van der Heijden, J., & van der Heijden, R. (2023). How can transnational municipal networks foster local collaborative regimes for environmental management? Environmental Management, 71(3), 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01685-w

Purdy, J. M. (2012). A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02525.x

Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x

Tonelli, D. F., Brito, M. J., & Zambalde, A. L. (2018). Antecedents, process and equity outcomes: A study about collaborative governance. Cogent Business and Management, 5(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1469381

Trimble, M., Olivier, T., Anjos, L. A., Tadeu, N. D., Giordano, G., Mac Donnell, L., ... & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2022). How do basin committees deal with water crises? Reflections for adaptive water governance from South America. Water International, 47(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2021.2000895

Ulibarri, N. (2015). Tracing process to performance of collaborative governance: A comparative case study of federal hydropower licensing. Policy Studies Journal, 43(2), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12096

Ulibarri, N., & Scott, T. A. (2017). Linking network structure to collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw041

Ulibarri, N., Emerson, K., Imperial, M. T., Jager, N. W., Newig, J., & Weber, E. (2020). How does collaborative governance evolve? Insights from a medium-n case comparison. Policy and Society, 39(4), 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1785726

Wang, H., & Ran, B. (2023). Network governance and collaborative governance: A thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements. Public Management Review, 25(6), 1187–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2048687

Wanna, J. (2008). Collaborative government: Meanings, dimensions, drivers and outcomes. In J. O’Flynn & J. Wanna (Eds.), Collaborative governance: A new era of public policy in Australia (pp. 3–12). ANU Press.

Yin, R. K. (2015). Estudo de caso: Planejamento e métodos. Bookman.

Yin, R. K. (2016). Pesquisa qualitativa do início ao fim. Penso.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-21

How to Cite

Callegaro, S. (2025). Collaborative Governance for the Construction of Public Policies on Social Sustainability. Conference on Digital Government Research, 26. https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.992

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Research papers