AI-enabled co-creation for evidence-based policymaking
A conceptual model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.991Keywords:
Co-creation, Evidence-based policymaking, Artificial Intelligence, Public sectorAbstract
This study focuses on developing and validating the key parameters of Artificial Intelligence (AI) -enabled co-creation integrated into evidence-based policymaking. We critically analyzed prior research to ensure a participatory, data-driven, and iterative policymaking process. We identified essential parameters shaping AI-enabled co-creation processes in public sector organizations (PSOs), including legal conformance, sustainability, and ethics. The parameters were validated and refined through a workshop with experts from academia and technology organizations, contributing to the development of a conceptual model structured around four interconnected co-creation phases: 1) co-commissioning; 2) co-designing; 3) co-delivering; and 4) co-assessing. Our study contributes to both theory and practice. Concerning theory, it positions AI-enabled co-creation as a core institutionalized process within evidence-based policymaking rather than a standalone participatory practice. It also introduces a key conceptual distinction between digital co-creation, where digital tools facilitate participatory processes, and digital public service co-creation, where digital solutions are the co-creation outcomes. Concerning practice, the study provides a structured framework for integrating co-creation into policymaking, aligning AI-enabled mechanisms with four identified policy co-creation phases. The framework offers policymakers and public administrators actionable guidance on designing adaptive, stakeholder-driven, AI-supported policy solutions.
Downloads
References
Ali, M., Maratsi, M. I., Euripidis, L., Alexopoulos, C., & Charalabidis, Y. (2022). Analysis of Reviews on Greek Municipalities to Improve Public Service Delivery and Citizen Satisfaction: A Tool for Co-creation and Co-design. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1145/3575879.3576008
Andersen, I. E., & Jæger, B. (1999). Scenario Workshops and Consensus Conferences: Towards More Democratic Decision-Making. Science and Public Policy, 26(5), 331–340.
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2021). Public Governance as Co-Creation: A Strategy for Revitalizing the Public Sector and Rejuvenating Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Banisar, D., Parmar, S., de Silva, L., & Excell, C. (2011). Moving from principles to rights: Rio 2012 and access to information, public participation, and justice. Sustainable Development Law & Policy, 12, 8.
Berlin Declaration. (2020). Berlin Declaration on Digital Society and Value-based Digital Government | Shaping Europe’s digital future. [link]
Borum, N., Petersson, E., & Frimodt-Møller, S. (2014). The Resilience of Analog Tools in Creative Work Practices. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI 2014), 8510, 23–24.
Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value. Voluntas, 23(4), 1119–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11266-012-9309-6/TABLES/2
BPC Policy Center. (2019). Evidence-Based Policymaking Primer Why Base Policies on Evidence? 8.
Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). Co-creation and co-production in public services: Urgent issues in practice and research. Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204956
Cordella, A., Paletti, A., & Shaikh, M. (2018). Renegotiating Public Value with Co-Production. In In: Tucci, Christopher, L. and Afuah, Allan and Viscusi, Gianluigi, (eds.) Creating and Capturing Value through Crowdsourcing. Oxford Scholarship (pp. 181-203.). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198816225.003.0008
Cortés-Cediel, M. E., Segura-Tinoco, A., Cantador, I., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2023). Trends and challenges of e-government chatbots: Advances in exploring open government data and citizen participation content. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101877
Dainow, B., & Brey, P. (2021). Ethics by design and ethics of use approaches for artificial intelligence.
Edelmann, N., Livieri, G., & Tambouris, E. (2023, September). Ethics challenges in public service co-creation. CEUR Workshop Proceedings EGOV-CeDEM-EPart Conference.
Edelmann, N., & Mergel, I. (2021). Co-production of digital public services in Austrian public administrations. Administrative Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010022
Edelmann, N., & Mureddu, F. (2023). Public Policies for Digital Co-Creation in Public Services. In In Elgar Encyclopedia of Services. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Edelmann, N., & Pereira, J. V. (2024). Public administrators’ perception of ethical issues in public sector co-creation processes and outcomes: A meta-synthesis of cases. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 14–21.
Edelmann, N., & Virkar, S. (2023). The Impact of Sustainability on Co-Creation of Digital Public Services. Administrative Sciences, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020043
Eseonu, T. (2022). Co-creation as social innovation: including ‘hard-to-reach’ groups in public service delivery. Public Money & Management, 42(5), 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.2017253
European Commission. (2019). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI.
European Commission. (2021). Ethics By Design and Ethics of Use Approaches for Artificial Intelligence.
European Environment Agency. (2023). The case for public participation in sustainability transitions. [link]
European Union. (2024). Valorisation policies : code of practice on industry-academia co-creation : Commission recommendation. https://doi.org/10.2777/05455
Evidence-Based Policymaking Collaborative. (2016). Principles of Evidence-Based Policymaking. Evidence-Based Policymaking Collaborative, September, 1–11.
Fedorowicz, M., & Aron, L. Y. (2021). Improving Evidence-Based Policymaking : A Review.
Flores, A. M., Pavan, M. C., & Paraboni, I. (2022). User profiling and satisfaction inference in public information access services. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 58(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10844-021-00661-W/TABLES/10
Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., III, H. D., & Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for Datasets: Documentation to facilitate communication between dataset creators and consumers. Communications of the ACM, 64(12).
Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. M. J. (2016). Impact Evaluation in Practice, Second Edition. Inter-American Development Bank and World Bank.
Giannelos, K., Wiarda, M., & Doorn, N. (2024). Challenges to ethical public engagement in research funding: a perspective from practice. Open Research Europe, 4, 179. https://doi.org/10.12688/OPENRESEUROPE.18126.2
Gottesdiener, E. (2002). Requirements by Collaboration: Workshops for Defining Needs. Addison-Wesley Professional.
Hardebolle, C., Macko, V., Ramachandran, V., Holzer, A., & Jermann, P. (2023). Digital Ethics Canvas: A Guide For Ethical Risk Assessment And Mitigation In The Digital Domain.
Head, B. (2010a). Evidence-based policy : principles and requirements. Strenghtening Evidence-Based Policy in the Australian Federation - Volume 1: Proceedings., May, 13–26.
Head, B. (2010b). Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges. Policy and Society, 29(2), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.001
Inie, N., & Dalsgaard, P. (2017). How Interaction Designers Use Tools to Capture, Manage, and Collaborate on Ideas. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2668–2675.
Jacobs, C., Rivett, U., & Chemisto, M. (2018). Developing capacity through co-design: The case of two municipalities in rural South Africa. Information Technology for Development, 25, 204–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2018.1476833
Jalonen, H., Kokkola, J., Laihonen, H., Kirjavainen, H., Kaartemo, V., & V"ah"amaa, M. (2021). Reaching hard-to-reach people through digital means--Citizens as initiators of co-creation in public services. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34, 799–816.
Jaspers, S., & Steen, T. (2019). The sustainability of outcomes in temporary co-production. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33, 62–77.
Jaspers, S., & Steen, T. (2021). Does co-production lead to the creation of public value? Balancing the dimensions of public value creation in urban mobility planning. Administration & Society, 53(4), 619–646.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Khan, G. F., Swar, B., & Lee, S. K. (2014). Social Media Risks and Benefits. [link], 32(5), 606–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314524701
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, PA., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Comput Hum Behav, 19(3), 335–353.
Lember, V. (2017). The increasing role of digital technologies in co-production. In In T Brandsen, Steen, T., Verschuere, B. (Ed.), Co-production and co-creation engaging citizens in public services. New York: Routledge.
Lember, V., Brandsen, T., & Tõnurist, P. (2019). The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation. [link], 21(11), 1665–1686. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1619807
Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003
Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2019). Co-commissioning of public services and outcomes in the UK: Bringing co-production into the strategic commissioning cycle. Public Money & Management, 39(4), 241–252.
Mahmoud, I., Ferreira, I., Arlati, A., Bradely, S., Lupp, G., & Nunes, N. (2023). Towards a Co-Governance Approach For Nature-Based Solutions. In Guidelines for Co-Creation and Co-Governance of Nature-Based Solutions: Insights from EU-Funded Projects (pp. 44–54). European Commission.
Manser Payne, E. H., Dahl, A. J., & Peltier, J. (2021). Digital servitization value co-creation framework for AI services: a research agenda for digital transformation in financial service ecosystems. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(2), 200–222.
McKenna, K. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Causes and consequences of social interaction on the Internet: A conceptual framework. Media Psychology, 1(3), 249–269.
Meijer, A. (2016). Coproduction as a Structural Transformation of the Public Sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(6), 596–611.
Mejlgade Lab, rum13 & Å. V. R. (2017). City As a 1:1 Green Laboratory: Using VR to Involve Citizens in the Greening and Climate Adaptation of Nørre Stenbro.
Misuraca, G., Barcevicius, E., & Codagnone, C. (2020). Exploring Digital Government Transformation in the EU – Understanding Public Sector Innovation in a Data-Driven Society.
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
Needham, C. (2008). Realising the potential of co-production: Negotiating improvements in public services. Social Policy and Society, 7(2), 221–231.
NSW Public Service Commission. (2022). The Code of Ethics and Conduct for NSW government sector employees. 2, 1–14.
OECD. (2016). Recommendation of the Council on Improving Ethical Conduct in the Public Service Including Principles for Managing Ethics in the Public Service. 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264256934-9-en
OECD. (2021). Good Practice Principles for Data Ethics in the Public Sector. 1–16.
OECD. (2022). OECD Guidelines for Citizen Participation Processes. [link]
Ojo, A., & Rizun, N. (2021). What matters most to patients? On the Core Determinants of Patient Experience from Free Text Feedback. ICIS 2021 Proceedings, 19.
Ojo, A., Rizun, N., Walsh, G., Isazad, M., & Venosa, M. (2024). Prioritising national healthcare service issues from free text feedback – A computational text analysis & predictive modelling approach. Decision Support Systems, 181(March), 114215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2024.114215
Osborne, S. P. (2006). The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
Osborne, S. P. (2018). From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation? Public Management Review, 20(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461
Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
Ostrom, E., Parks, R. B., Whitaker, G. P., & Percy, S. L. (1978). The Public Service Production Process: A Framework for Analyzing Police Services - ProQuest. Policy Studies Journal, 7, 381.
Peters, D., Loke, L., & Ahmadpour, N. (2021). Toolkits, cards and games–a review of analogue tools for collaborative ideation. CoDesign, 17(4), 410–434.
Pevkur, A., Barborič, V. H., & Doig, A. (2018). Draft guide on public ethics prepared by the working group on public ethics. November.
Popescul, D., Murariu, L., Radu, L. D., & Georgescu, M. R. (2024). Digital Co-creation in Socially Sustainable Smart City Projects: Lessons from the European Union and Canada. IEEE Access.
Randma-Liiv, T., & Vooglaid, K. M. (2019). Organizing for e-participation: Learning from European experiences: Work Package 5 – Deliverable D5.2.
Reijers, W., Koidl, K., Lewis, D., Pandit, H. J., & Gordijn, B. (2018). Discussing ethical impacts in research and innovation: The ethics canvas. This Changes Everything–ICT and Climate Change: What Can We Do? 13th IFIP TC 9 International Conference on Human Choice and Computers, HCC13 2018, Held at the 24th IFIP World Computer Congress, WCC 2018, Proceedings, 299–313.
Rizun, N., Revina, A., & Edelmann, N. (2023). Application of Text Analytics in Public Service Co-Creation : Literature Review and Research Framework. In 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (DGO 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598471
Rizun, N., Revina, A., & Edelmann, N. (2025). Text analytics for co-creation in public sector organizations: a literature review-based research framework. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(125). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11112-1
Rodriguez Müller, A. P., Flores, C. C., Albrecht, V., Steen, T., & Crompvoets, J. (2021a). A scoping review of empirical evidence on (Digital) public services co-creation. Administrative Sciences, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040130
Rodriguez Müller, A. P., Flores, C. C., Albrecht, V., Steen, T., & Crompvoets, J. (2021b). A scoping review of empirical evidence on (Digital) public services co-creation. Administrative Sciences, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040130
Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation Policy Learning and Evidence-Based Policy Making. Public Administration Vol., 80(1), 1–22.
Scognamiglio, F., Sancino, A., Caló, F., Jacklin-Jarvis, C., & Rees, J. (2023). The public sector and co-creation in turbulent times: A systematic literature review on robust governance in the COVID-19 emergency. Public Administration, 101(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12875
Shneiderman, B. (2020). Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 10(4), 1–31.
Shneiderman, B. (2022). Human-centered AI. Oxford University Press.
Sicilia, M., Guarini, E., Sancino, A., Andreani, M., & Ruffini, R. (2016). Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314566008
Ståhlbröst, A., & Holst, M. (2017). Reflecting on actions in living lab research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2), 27–34.
Tallinn Declaration. (2017). Tallinn Declaration on eGovernment at the Ministerial Meeting during Estonian Presidency of the Council of the EU on 6 October 2017.
Thiebes, S., Lins, S., & Sunyaev, A. (2021). Trustworthy artificial intelligence. Electronic Markets, 31, 447–464.
Thomsen, C. (2013). Sustainability (world commission on environment and development definition). In Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 2358–2363). Springer.
Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the Public Sector Into an Arena for Co-Creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward. Administration and Society, 51(5), 795–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057
Türke, R.-E. (2012). Sustainable Governance. In S. Grösser & R. Zeier (Eds.), Systemic Management for Intelligent Organizations (pp. 237–248). Springer.
United Nations. (2015). THE 17 GOALS | Sustainable Development. [link]
van Noordt, C., Medaglia, R., & Tangi, L. (2023). Policy initiatives for Artificial Intelligence-enabled government: An analysis of national strategies in Europe. In Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231198411
Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Timeus, K., Tonurist, P., & Tummers, L. (2017). Changing public service delivery: Learning in co-creation. Policy and Society, 36(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1323711
Wiktorska-Święcka, A. (2018). Co-creation of public services in Poland in Statu Nascendi . A case study on senior co-housing policy at the urban level. Polish Political Science Review, 6(2), 26–54. https://doi.org/10.2478/ppsr-2018
Wirtz, B. W., Langer, P. F., & Fenner, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the public sector—a research agenda. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(13), 1103–1128.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nina Rizun, Noella Edelmann, Tomasz Janowski, Aleksandra Revina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
