Flying chairs, heated takes

a discourse analysis of audience comments on the São Paulo Mayoral debate across five major YouTube news channels

Authors

  • Gabriela B. Kurtz University Canada West, Canada
  • Stéfano de P. Carraro Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • Carlos R.G. Teixeira Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • Roberto Tietzmann Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • Isabel H. Manssour Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • Milene S. Silveira Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.989

Keywords:

Social media and politics, Discourse analysis, YouTube, Majoral election, Political polarization

Abstract

The 2024 São Paulo mayoral election sparked intense political discourse, particularly following a highly publicized altercation during a live debate on September 15. The incident, in which candidate José Luiz Datena struck Pablo Marçal with a chair, led to widespread discussion on social media, particularly on YouTube. This study investigates the dynamics of online discourse surrounding this event, focusing on audience engagement and sentiment across five major YouTube news channels: UOL, Folha de São Paulo, CNN Brasil, Poder360, and Itatiaia. Using a discourse analysis approach adapted from Teixeira et al. (2018), we collected and categorized 500 top-ranking YouTube comments, classifying them into four primary categories: Humor, Support, Criticism and Protest, and Neutral. A second layer of analysis further refined support and criticism, differentiating between pro-Datena, pro-Marçal, and general political dissatisfaction. Our findings reveal that humor was the dominant response across all platforms, suggesting a tendency toward memefication and satire in Brazilian digital political discourse. However, significant polarization was observed, with Datena receiving both overwhelming support and the highest level of criticism across outlets. Media framing influenced audience reactions, as outlets with in-depth coverage fostered broader critiques, while those with shorter, sensationalist clips amplified polarized sentiments. This study contributes to research on political communication and social media discourse by demonstrating how digital platforms mediate political controversies and shape public perception. The results highlight the role of algorithmic content curation in reinforcing ideological divides and fostering emotionally charged interactions. By offering a systematic analysis of audience reactions, this study provides insights into the evolving nature of digital political engagement in Brazil and lays the groundwork for future research on media framing and discourse analysis in online environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-05-21 — Updated on 2025-05-26

Versions

How to Cite

Kurtz, G. B., Carraro, S. de P., Teixeira, C. R., Tietzmann, R., Manssour, I. H., & Silveira, M. S. (2025). Flying chairs, heated takes: a discourse analysis of audience comments on the São Paulo Mayoral debate across five major YouTube news channels. Conference on Digital Government Research, 1. https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.989 (Original work published May 21, 2025)