Flying chairs, heated takes

a discourse analysis of audience comments on the São Paulo Mayoral debate across five major YouTube news channels

Authors

  • Gabriela B. Kurtz University Canada West, Canada
  • Stéfano de P. Carraro Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • Carlos R.G. Teixeira Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • Roberto Tietzmann Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • Isabel H. Manssour Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • Milene S. Silveira Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.989

Keywords:

Social media and politics, Discourse analysis, YouTube, Majoral election, Political polarization

Abstract

The 2024 São Paulo mayoral election sparked intense political discourse, particularly following a highly publicized altercation during a live debate on September 15. The incident, in which candidate José Luiz Datena struck Pablo Marçal with a chair, led to widespread discussion on social media, particularly on YouTube. This study investigates the dynamics of online discourse surrounding this event, focusing on audience engagement and sentiment across five major YouTube news channels: UOL, Folha de São Paulo, CNN Brasil, Poder360, and Itatiaia. Using a discourse analysis approach adapted from Teixeira et al. (2018), we collected and categorized 500 top-ranking YouTube comments, classifying them into four primary categories: Humor, Support, Criticism and Protest, and Neutral. A second layer of analysis further refined support and criticism, differentiating between pro-Datena, pro-Marçal, and general political dissatisfaction. Our findings reveal that humor was the dominant response across all platforms, suggesting a tendency toward memefication and satire in Brazilian digital political discourse. However, significant polarization was observed, with Datena receiving both overwhelming support and the highest level of criticism across outlets. Media framing influenced audience reactions, as outlets with in-depth coverage fostered broader critiques, while those with shorter, sensationalist clips amplified polarized sentiments. This study contributes to research on political communication and social media discourse by demonstrating how digital platforms mediate political controversies and shape public perception. The results highlight the role of algorithmic content curation in reinforcing ideological divides and fostering emotionally charged interactions. By offering a systematic analysis of audience reactions, this study provides insights into the evolving nature of digital political engagement in Brazil and lays the groundwork for future research on media framing and discourse analysis in online environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bail, C. (2022). Breaking the social media prism: How to make our platforms less polarizing. Princeton University Press.

Bardin, L. (1977). L’analyse de contenu. Presses universitaires de France. [link]

Bishop, S. (2020). Algorithmic experts: Selling algorithmic lore on youtube. Social Media + Society, 6(1), 2056305119897323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119897323.

Castello, G. (2024). Conectividade significativa no brasil: O retrato da população [Accessed: ”2025-01-17”]. In Conectividade significativa: Propostas para medição e o retrato da população no brasil. [link]

De Albuquerque, J. P. S., & Rodas, C. M. (2022). Radicalização política no youtube: O papel dos sistemas algorítmicos na construção de regimes de informação. XXII ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA E PÓSGRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO.

García Marín, J. (2023, January). Miedo (in)fundado al algoritmo: Las recomendaciones de youtube y la polarización. I+D+i PID2021-128272NB-I00 financiado por MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER “Una manera de hacer Europa”. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C74-2023-05.

Herring, S. C. (2005). Computer-mediated discourse. The handbook of discourse analysis, 612–634.

nic.br. (2023a). Pesquisa sobre o uso das tecnologias de informação e comunicação nos domicílios brasileiros: Pesquisa TIC Domicílios 2023 [Microdados] [Accessed: ”2025-01-17”]. [link]

nic.br. (2023b). Pesquisa sobre o uso das tecnologias de informação e comunicação nos domicílios brasileiros: TIC Domicílios 2023 [Indicadores] [Accessed: ”2025-01-17”]. [link]

Rasmussen, S. H. R., & Petersen, M. B. (2022). From echo chambers to resonance chambers: How offline political events enter and are amplified in online networks.

Reis, R., Zanetti, D., & Frizzera, L. (2019). Algorítmos e desinformação: O papel do youtube no cenário político brasileiro. VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política.

Reis, R., Zanetti, D., & Frizzera, L. (2020). A conveniência dos algoritmos: O papel do youtube nas eleições brasileiras de 2018. Compolítica, 10(1), 35–58.

Rieder, B., Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Coromina, Ò. (2018). From ranking algorithms to ‘ranking cultures’: Investigating the modulation of visibility in youtube search results. Convergence, 24(1), 50–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736982.

Teixeira, C. R. G., Kurtz, G., Leuck, L. P., Tietzmann, R., de Souza, D. R., Lerina, J. M. F., Manssour, I. H., & Silveira, M. S. (2018). Humor, support and criticism: A taxonomy for discourse analysis about political crisis on twitter. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209330.

União Internacional de Telecomunicações. (2020). Manual for measuring ICT access and use by households and individuals, 2020 edition [Accessed: ”2025-01-17”]. [link]

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-05-21 — Updated on 2025-05-26

Versions

How to Cite

Kurtz, G. B., Carraro, S. de P., Teixeira, C. R., Tietzmann, R., Manssour, I. H., & Silveira, M. S. (2025). Flying chairs, heated takes: a discourse analysis of audience comments on the São Paulo Mayoral debate across five major YouTube news channels. Conference on Digital Government Research, 26. https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.989 (Original work published May 21, 2025)

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Research papers