Challenges for monitoring flexible work
trade-offs of formal and informal information systems use
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.982Keywords:
Telework, Information Systems, results-based management, PGDAbstract
Flexible work has become a trend since the pandemic emergency. All around the world, governments have increased the number of civil servants working in hybrid or full-remote work settings. This new landscape of work practices has raised several new challenges to public administrations, including monitoring work activities. Some governments support the idea that flexible work requires new monitoring methods. Instead of controlling timesheets, a new trend towards results management has emerged. Accordingly, new management information systems have been developed to support the management methods. This paper discusses challenges from data use through the new information systems for flexible work monitoring. Based on a Brazilian Federal government case, we raise new questions regarding the levels of formality of the data and its use. We conclude that flexible work information systems can produce more data regarding work practices. However, the level of formality in the use of the information produced may reduce the data availability to improve decision-making.
Downloads
References
Abrucio, F. L. (2007). Trajetória recente da gestão pública brasileira: um balanço crítico e a renovação da agenda de reformas. Revista de administração pública, 41, 67-86.
Altaee, M. A. H. (2018). Twinning between informal and formal information Systems. Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 8(1), 37-55.
Bell, B. S., McAlpine, K. L., & Hill, N. S. (2023). Leading Virtually. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 339-362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-050115
Bloom, N., Han, R., & Liang, J. (2024). Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance. Nature, 1-6.
Brazil. (2020, July 30) Instrução Normativa nº 65, Diário Oficial da União, por Ministério da Economia / Secretaria Especial de Desburocratização, Gestão e Governo Digital / Secretaria de Gestão e Desempenho de Pessoal [link]
Brazil. (2022, May 17) Decreto nº 11.072, Diário Oficial da União, por Presidência da República/ Secretaria-Geral/ Subchefia para Assuntos Jurídico [link] ou [link]
Brazil (2023, July 28) Instrução Normativa Conjunta SEGES-SGPRT /MGI nº 24, de 28 de julho de 2023, publicado em 31/07/2023, edição 144 , seção 1, página 57 do Diário Oficial da União, por Ministério da Gestão e da Inovação em Serviços Públicos / Secretaria de Gestão e Inovação [link]
Brazil (2023, December 21) Instrução Normativa Conjunta SGP-SRT-SEGES/MGI nº 52, Diário Oficial da União, por Ministério da Gestão e da Inovação em Serviços Públicos / Secretaria de Gestão de Pessoas [link]
Brazil (2024a) Site Management and Performance Programa. Programa de Gestão e Desempenho. [link]
Brazil (2024b) Site National Aviation Agency. Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil. [link].
Brazil. (2024, October 7) Resolução CPGD/MGI Nº 1, Diário Oficial da União, por Ministério da Gestão e da Inovação em Serviços Públicos / Secretaria de Gestão e Inovação [link]
Bresser Pereira, L. C. (1998). A reforma do Estado dos anos 90: lógica e mecanismos de controle. Lua Nova: Revista de cultura e política, 49-95.
Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when Stakeholders matter. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722
By, R. T. (2007). Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, 5(4), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010500359250
Camões, M. R. d. S., Gomes, A. d. O., Rizardi, B., & Lemos, J. (2023). Os ciclos de engajamento no trabalho de servidores públicos federais. Revista de administração pública, 57, e2023-0061.
Eom, S.-J., Choi, N., & Sung, W. (2016). The use of smart work in government: Empirical analysis of Korean experiences. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 562-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.005
Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). The new public management in action. Oxford University Press, USA.
Galanti, T., Guidetti, G., Mazzei, E., Zappala, S., & Toscano, F. (2021). Work From Home During the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Impact on Employees' Remote Work Productivity, Engagement, and Stress. J Occup Environ Med, 63(7), e426-e432. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002236
Ghobadi, S. (2015). What drives knowledge sharing in software development teams: A literature review and classification framework. Information & Management, 52(1), 82-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.10.008
Johnson, G. H. (1986). The relative use of formal and informal information in the evaluation of individual performance.
Karimian, P., Noruzi, A., & Nazari, M. (2022). Preference Analysis of Formal and Informal Information Sources in Decision Making of Managers in SMEs. Informology, 1(1), 85-102.
Kassen, M. (2013). A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 508-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.012
Kisil, N. (2024). Working in the “New Normal”: Exploring the Link Between Hybrid Work and Need Fulfillment Concordia University].
Kleiman, F., & Barbosa, M. M. (2024). Management and Performance Program Chatbot: A Use Case of Large Language Model in the Federal Public Sector in Brazil. Digital Government: Research and Practice.
Kleiman, F., Farias, R. D. S., Nogueira, N. J., Brito, T. B. D. O., Barbosa, M. M., Marasca Bertazzi, D. M., & Rego, R. S. M. P. (2023). New ways for monitoring the public workforce after the pandemic Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Gda?sk, Poland. https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598508
Klonek, F., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Designing SMART teamwork. Organizational Dynamics, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2021.100841
Kothawala, A., Haddad, A. J., Loa, P., Lee, Y., Circella, G., & Bhat, C. R. Hybrid Workers’ Activity Intensity: Post-Pandemic Comparison of Telework-Only and In-Person Workdays.
Kuipers, B. S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L., Grandia, J., & Van Der Voet, J. (2013). The Management of Change in Public Organizations: A Literature Review. Public Administration, 92(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12040
Lane, J.-E. (2002). New public management: an introduction. Routledge.
Madureira, C. G., Rando, B., & Ferraz, D. (2020). The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese Civil Servants Perceptions. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(4), 300-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1719510
Madureira, C., & Rando, B. (2022). Teleworking in Portuguese public administration during the COVID-19 pandemic. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.16.2.0119
Marković, N. (2024). Key Factors of Remote and Hybrid Work Model–what have we learned after COVID-19? Psychē: Časopis studenata psihologije, 7, 87-103.
Offermann, P., Blom, S., Schönherr, M., & Bub, U. (2010). Artifact types in information systems design science–a literature review. International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems,
Pan Fagerlin, W., & Lövstål, E. (2020). Top managers’ formal and informal control practices in product innovation processes. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 17(4), 497-524.
Pojo, R., Wehbe, C., & Kleiman, F. (2024). Todo trabalho é híbrido. In A EVOLUÇÃO DO TELETRABALHO - TOMO V: UMA VISÃO MULTIDISCIPLINAR (pp. 296-310). Lacier Editora.
Pryor, M. G., Taneja, S., Humphreys, J., Anderson, D., & Singleton, L. (2008). Challenges facing change management theories and research. Delhi business review, 9(1), 1-20.
Rego, R. S. P. a. C. J., José Celso. (2022). Princípios, Condições e Diretrizes do Programa de Gestão e Desempenho (PGD) para o Governo Federal Brasileiro. O Estado de Sao Paulo.
Røed, K., & Raaum, O. (2003). Administrative registers–Unexplored reservoirs of scientific knowledge? The economic journal, 113(488), F258-F281.
Rubin, R. S. (1979). Flexitime: its implementation in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 39(3), 277-282.
Saundry, R., Jones, C., & Wibberley, G. (2015). The challenge of managing informally. Employee Relations, 37(4), 428-441.
Schedler, K., & Proeller, I. (2000). New public management. Stuttgart/Wien.
Schuster, M. (2024). Studies on remote work: challenges and implications for hybrid work arrangements Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern-Landau].
Silva, I. G. (2001). A reforma do Estado brasileiro nos anos 90: processos e contradições. Lutas Sociais(7), 81-94.
Visser, J. (2015). Barriers in open energy data: An exploratory study into open energy data barriers and their mitigation strategies. repository.tudelft.nl. [link]
Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., & El-Haddadeh, R. (2021). The resurgence of business process re-engineering in public sector transformation efforts: exploring the systemic challenges and unintended consequences. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 19(3), 993-1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-021-00527-2
Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. In Applied Social Research Methods Series (Vol. 5). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fernando Kleiman, Camila da Silveira Machado, Nathália Junca Nogueira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
