Multi-level Collaborative Governance Framework for Designing Accountable AI Systems for Emergency Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.980Keywords:
Collaborative governance, AI systems, governance design, tribal nations, socio-technical systems, AI chatbotsAbstract
This paper addresses a gap in the AI governance literature in understanding collaboration between national governments and tribal nations in governing AI systems for emergency management. This conceptual work develops and presents a governance design framework for accountable AI systems to fill the knowledge gap by drawing from the fields of public administration, information systems, indigenous studies, and emergency management. This framework situates the governance framework in a cross-sovereignty historical, legal, and policy contexts. It captures the multi-level features and embeddedness of governance structures, including the levels of collaborative governance structure, software system governance rules, and technical software system design. The focal governance dynamics involve the collaborative process in the bi-directional relationship between governance rules and technical design for accountability and the feedback loop. The framework highlights the importance of multi-level and process considerations in designing accountable AI systems. Productive future research avenues include empirical investigation and resulting refinement of the framework and analytical rigor employing institutional grammar.
Downloads
References
Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Clemmensen, T., & Kurosu, M. (2013). Reframing HCI through local and indigenous perspectives. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(4), 201-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.765759
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571.
Brummel, L. (2025). Stakeholder involvement as a form of accountability? Perspectives on the accountability function of stakeholder bodies in Dutch public agencies. Public Policy and Administration, 40(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231203283
Chavez, R. (2021, October 20). Why some Indigenous tribes are being left behind in Louisiana’s Ida recovery. PBS News. [link]
Chen, T., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Burke, G. B., Dey, A., & Werthmuller, D. (2024). Characterizing technology affordances, constraints, and coping strategies for information dissemination to the public: Insights from emergency messaging in US local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101910
Chen, Y.-C., & Ahn, M. (2022). Governing AI Systems for Public Values: Design Principles and a Process Framework. In J. B. Bullock, Y.-C. Chen, J. Himmelreich, V. M. Hudson, A. Korinek, M. M. Young, & B. Zhang (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.001.0001
Chen, Y.-C., Ahn, M. J., & Wang, Y.-F. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Public Values: Value Impacts and Governance in the Public Sector. Sustainability, 15(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064796
Chen, Y. C., Cheng, X., & Knepper, R. (2021, June). Performance of US scientific research cyberinfrastructure: Structural and relational factors for usage. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 424-436). https://doi.org/10.1145/3463677.3463722
Chen, Y.-C., & Lee, J. (2018a). Collaborative data networks for public service: Governance, management, and performance. Public Management Review, 20(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1305691
Chen, Y.-C., & Lee, J. (2018b). Collaborative Data Networks for Public Service: Governance, Management, and Performance. Public Management Review, 20(5), 672–690.
Coglianese, C., & Lehr, D. (2019). Transparency and Algorithmic Governance. Administrative Law Review, 71(1), 1-56. [link]
Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.
Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: A performance matrix. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 717-747. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016
Feigenbaum, J., Jaggard, A. D., & Wright, R. N. (2011, September). Towards a formal model of accountability. In Proceedings of the 2011 New Security Paradigms Workshop (pp. 45-56). https://doi.org/10.1145/2073276.2073282
Flavelle, C., & Goodluck, K. (2021, June 27). Dispossessed, Again: Climate Change Hits Native Americans Especially Hard. The New York Times. [link]
Frantz, C. K., & Siddiki, S. (2021). Institutional Grammar 2.0: A specification for encoding and analyzing institutional design. Public Administration, 99(2), 222-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12719
Gasco-Hernandez, M., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2022). Unpacking the role of technology, leadership, governance and collaborative capacities in inter-agency collaborations. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101710
Grant, R. W., & Keohane, R. O. (2005). Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051476
Intahchomphoo, C. (2018). Indigenous peoples, social media, and the digital divide: A systematic literature review. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 42(4), 85-111. https://doi.org/10.17953/aicrj.42.4.intahchomphoo
Kapucu, N. (2006). Interagency communication networks during emergencies: Boundary spanners in multiagency coordination. The American review of public administration, 36(2), 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005280605
Kettl, D. F. (2006). Managing boundaries in American administration: The collaboration imperative. Public Administration Review, 66(Supplement to Issue 6 (Special Symposium on Collaborative Public Management), 10-19.
König, P. D., & Wenzelburger, G. (2020). Opportunity for renewal or disruptive force? How artificial intelligence alters democratic politics. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101489
Koppell, J. G. (2005). Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of “Multiple Accountabilities Disorder.” Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00434.x
Lampson, B. (2005, October). Accountability and freedom. In Cambridge Computer Seminar, Cambridge, UK (pp. 1-26).
Meijer, A. (2024). Design science in public administration: Producing both situational interventions and generic knowledge. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, gvae012. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvae012
Mikhaylov, S. J., Esteve, M., & Campion, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the public sector: opportunities and challenges of cross-sector collaboration. Philosophical transactions of the royal society a: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 376(2128), 20170357. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0357
Nabatchi, T. (2018). Public values frames in administration and governance. Perspectives on public management and governance, 1(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvx009
Ostashewski, M., Johnson, S., Marshall, G., & Paul, C. (2020). Fostering reconciliation through collaborative research in Unama’ki: engaging communities through indigenous methodologies and research-creation. Yearbook for Traditional Music, 52, 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/ytm.2020.7
Ostrom, E. (2010). Institutional Analysis and Development: Elements of the Framework in Historical Perspective. In C. Crothers (Ed.), Historical Developments and Theoretical Approaches in Sociology: Vol. II (pp. 261–288). EOLSS (Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems) Publishers, Co. Ltd.
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. University of Michigan press.
Overman, S., & Schillemans, T. (2022). Toward a public administration theory of felt accountability. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13417
Parsons, M., Fisher, K., & Nalau, J. (2016). Alternative approaches to co-design: Insights from indigenous/academic research collaborations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 20, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.07.001
Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00045
Quick, K. (2021). Tribal sovereignty and the limits and potential of inter-governmental collaboration. In J. W. Meek (Ed.), Handbook of Collaborative Public Management (pp. 253–267). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Quick, K. S., & Feldman, M. S. (2014). Boundaries as Junctures: Collaborative Boundary Work for Building Efficient Resilience. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 673–695. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut085
Robert, T. (1988). Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Public Law 93-288 as amended).
Ruijer, E. (2021). Designing and implementing data collaboratives: A governance perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101612
Tiller, V. E. V., & Harris, L. (2015). Tiller’s Guide to Indian Country: Economic Profiles of American Indian Reservations, Third Edition. Bow Arrow Publishing Company.
Tsai, C. H., Rayi, P., Kadire, S., Wang, Y. F., Krafka, S., Zendejas, E., & Chen, Y. C. (2023). Co-design disaster management chatbot with indigenous communities. In 20th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM) (Vol. 2023, p. 1).
United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. (2022, January 28). Indian Entities Recognized by and Eligible To Receive Services From the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. Notices (87 FR 4636). Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration; Federal Register. [link]
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Kehl, I. (2022). Governance of artificial intelligence: A risk and guideline-based integrative framework. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101685
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Sturm, B. J. (2020). The Dark Sides of Artificial Intelligence: An Integrated AI Governance Framework for Public Administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(9), 818–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1749851
Young, M. M., Bullock, J., & Jesse D. Lecy. (2019). Artificial Discretion as a Tool of Governance: A Framework for Understanding the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Public Administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(4), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvz014
Young, M. M., Himmelreich, J., Bullock, J. B., & Kim, K. C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and administrative evil. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 4(3), 244-258. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvab006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yu-Che Chen, Chun-Hua Tsai, Edouardo Zendejas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
