Generation of public value through the adoption of government blockchain networks
The analysis of the Brazilian federal government
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.979Keywords:
government blockchain network, public-value, e-government, case studyAbstract
This paper analyses the generation of public value through the adoption of government blockchain networks by different entities of the Brazilian federal government. To this end, the theory of Public Value in Electronic Government is used, with the approach proposed by Twizeyimana & Andersson (2019) with six dimensions of analysis. The method is a multiple case study with the three Brazilian blockchain networks: RBB, RNDS and PIER, which are at different stages of development. The results indicate the governance is a common challenge identified, and exchanging information with other networks is seen as a way of learning and developing the own models. Indeed, the already implemented government blockchain networks (RNDS and PIER) generate public value in the six dimensions and that the RBB has the potential to generate public value in the same dimensions. Furthermore, the choice of blockchain technology was an efficient solution for PIER and RNDS when compared to other technologies available at the time. The RBB was created to be an infrastructure for the development of other blockchain artifacts, to later house applications using the same technology. Governance challenges and balance between participants are crucial aspects in the development of networks. While RBB, a top-down initiative (governance development prior to applications) seeks a stable balance, the hierarchical deployment of PIER and RNDS allows for faster progress of deployment and development of applications on these networks. The paper has limitations in analysing public value from the perspective of public managers and not from co-creation with citizens. As future research, we suggest approaching the cases from the perspective of innovation theories and an investigation of the blockchain ecosystem in government in Brazil.
Downloads
References
ALASTRIA. (2021, October 15). La Red. [link].
Alford, John; O'flynn, Janine. (2009). Making sense of public value: Concepts, critiques and emergent meanings. Intl Journal of Public Administration, v. 32, n. 3-4, p. 171-191.
Allessie, David; Janssen, M.; Ubacht, J.; Cunningham, S.; e Van Der Harst, G. (2019). The consequences of blockchain architectures for the governance of public services: A case study of the movement of excise goods under duty exemptions. Information Polity, v. 24, n. 4, p. 487-499.
Alshibly, H.; Chiong, R. Customer empowerment: Does it influence electronic government success? A citizen-centric perspective. (2015). Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(6), 393-404.
Aristidou, Christiana; Marcou, Evdokia. (2019). Blockchain standards and government applications. Journal of ICT Standardization, p. 287–312-287–312.
Atzori, M. (2018). Blockchain Governance and The Role of Trust Service Providers: The TrustedChain (R) Network. Journal of the British Blockchain Association, 1(1), 55–65, 2018. https://doi.org/10.31585/jbba-1-1-(3).
BACEN. (2022, 10 January). Banco Central do Brasil. Notícias. [link].
Batubara, F. Rizal; Ubacht, Jolien; Janssen, Marijn. (2018). Challenges of blockchain technology adoption for e-government: a systematic literature review. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age. p. 1-9.
BFA. Blockchain Federal Argentina. (2022, January 10). [link].
BRASIL. (2022, January 10). Constituição. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Disponível: [link].
Burgos, Aldenio de Vilaca; Oliveira Filho, Jose Deodoro de; SUARES, Marcus Vinicius Cursino & ALMEIDA, Rafael Sarres de. (2017). Distributed ledger technical research in Central Bank of Brazil. Central Bank of Brazil. Brasilia - DF, Brazil. 31st August 2017
Bryson, John M.; Crosby, Barbara C.; Bloomberg, Laura. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, v. 74, n. 4, p. 445-456.
Christidis, K.; Devetsikiotis, M. (2016). Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access. vol. 4, pp. 2292-2303. Doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2566339.
Cordella, A.; Bonina, C. M. (2012). A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 512-520.
Cordella, A.; e Paletti, A. (2018). ICTs and Value Creation in Public Sector: Manufacturing Logic vs Service Logic. Information Polity 23: 125–41. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-170061.
Covarrubias, Jersain Zadamig L.; Covarrubias, Irving Norehem L. (2021), Different types of government and governance in the blockchain. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 10(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv10i1art1
DATASUS. MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE (2020, March 15). A estrada para transformação digital do SUS. [link].
DE FILIPPI, Primavera; MANNAN, Morshed; REIJERS, Wessel. (2020). Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance. Technology in Society. Vol. 62. 101284. ISSN 0160-791X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284.
EBSI. (2021, October 15). European Blockchain Services Infrastructure. [link].
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academic Management Review, 14, 532-550.
Falwadiya, Himanshu; Dhingra, Sanjay. (2020). Blockchain technology adoption in government organizations: A systematic literature review. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing.
Hilgers, Dennis; Ihl, C. (2010). Citizensourcing: applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. International Journal of Public Participation, v. 4, n. 1, p. 67-88.
Khan, K. M.; Arshad, J.; Khan, M. M. (2018). Secure digital voting system based on blockchain technology. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 14 (1), 53-62.
Khan, K. M.; Arshad, J.; Khan, M. M. (2020). Investigating performance constraints for blockchain based secure e-voting system. Future Generation Computer Systems-the International Journal of eScience, 105, 13–26.
Lacchain. (2021, November 11). Inicio. [link].
Lopes, K. M. G.; Luciano, E. M.; Macadar, M. A. (2018). Criando Valor Público em Serviços Digitais: uma proposta de conceito. Revista Gestão.Org. v. 16, Edição Especial. p. 207-221. ISSN 1679-1827
Ølnes, Svein; Ubacht, Jolien; Janssen, Marijn. (2017). Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Government Information Quarterly, v. 34, n. 3, p. 355-364.
Saxena, S.; Shao, D.; Nikiforova, A.; Thapliyal, R. (2022). Invoking blockchain technology in e-government services: a cybernetic perspective. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance. 24(3), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-10-2021-0128
Scholl, Hans Jochen; Rodríguez-Bolívar, Manuel Pedro. (2019). Regulation as both enabler of technology use and global competitive tool: The Gibraltar case. Government Information Quarterly, v. 36, n. 3, p. 601-613.
Stoker, G. Public value management a new narrative for networked governance? (2006). The American review of public administration, 36(1), 41-57.
SUSEP. Superintendência de Seguros Privados. (2022, January 10). Nova plataforma para intercâmbio de informações entre SUSEP, Bacen e CVM. [link].
TCU. (2022, November 7). TCU e BNDES lançam Rede Blockchain Brasil e definem próximos passos. Notícias. [link].
Twizeyimana, Jean Damascene; & Andersson, Annika. (2019). The public value of E-Government–A literature review. Government information quarterly, v. 36, n. 2, p. 167-178.
Van Veenstra, A. F. E. (2012). IT-induced public sector transformation. TU Delft, Delft University of Technology.
Williams, I.; Shearer, H. (2011). Appraising Public Value: Past, Present and futures. Public Administration, 89(4), 1367–1384.
Yang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Wang, T. (2022). Blockchain Technology Application Maturity Assessment Model for Digital Government Public Service Projects. International Journal of Crowd Science, 6(4), 184194. https://doi.org/10.26599/IJCS.2022.9100025
Yin, Robert K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications. Design and Methods. 6th edition. Los Angeles, Sage.
Zheng, Z.; Xie, S.; Dai, H-N.; Chen, X.; e Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, v. 14, n. 4, p. 352-375.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Milber Fernandes Morais Bourguignon, Marie Anne Macadar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
