Move Fast and Break Things?
Barriers to GovTech Procurement in the United Kingdom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.972Keywords:
GovTech, Public Procurement, Temporality, Digital Government, StartupsAbstract
Governments depend on procurement to help them achieve their digital transformation goals. Historically, public sector technology contracts have overwhelmingly flowed to large technology firms. However, governments have begun to explore opening up the procurement process to GovTech startups to drive innovation. Yet, this policy goal has proved challenging to implement. This paper explores why this is the case by presenting the case study of GovTech startup procurement in the United Kingdom. By focusing on the role of temporal dynamics in shaping procurement processes and drawing on 32 primary interviews with stakeholders across the UK GovTech ecosystem and supplementary archival data, this study identifies how the financial, staffing, and strategic processes within public sector bureaucracies enact an erratic and unpredictable procurement rhythm. It further demonstrates the challenges startups face when encountering this rhythm, struggling to predict or synchronise with it. Startups who are successful face new challenges from managing multiple rhythms. While conventional discourse often frames this procurement challenge as a mismatch between the "slow" public sector and "fast" startups, this paper instead reveals the complex and contradictory rhythms that frustrate GovTech procurement.
Downloads
References
Ancona, D., & Chong, C.-L. (1996). Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior.
Ancona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S., & Tushman, M. L. (2001). Time: A New Research Lens. The Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 645. https://doi.org/10.2307/3560246
Barcevičius, E., Cibaitė, G., Codagnone, C., Gineikytė, V., Klimavičiūtė, L., Liva, G., Matulevič, L., & Misuraca, G. (2019). Exploring digital government transformation in the EU: Analysis of the state of the art and review of literature. (G. Misuraca, Ed.). Publications Office. [link]
Bharosa, N. (2022). The rise of GovTech: Trojan horse or blessing in disguise? A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101692
Bharosa, N., & Janowski, T. (2024). The GovTech Challenge ?V GovTech and Public Value Creation. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 1043–1045. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657054.3659125
Blagoev, B., Hernes, T., Kunisch, S., & Schultz, M. (2023). Time as a Research Lens: A Conceptual Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 01492063231215032. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231215032
Bluedorn, A. C. (2002). The human organization of time: Temporal realities and experience (pp. xii, 367). Stanford University Press.
Boots, S., Clarke, A., Brousseau, C., & Lajoie, A. (2024). Breaking All the Rules: Information Technology Procurement in the Government of Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 67(3), 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12577
Bracken, M. (2020). The sad tale of Britain’s Government Digital Service—Public Digital. [link]
British Chamber of Commerce. (2024). SME Procurement Tracker (2024). [link]
Cabinet Office. (2020). Transforming Public Procurement. [link]
Clarke, A. (2020). Digital government units: What are they, and what do they mean for digital era public management renewal? International Public Management Journal, 23(3), 358–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2019.1686447
Clarke, A., & Margetts, H. (2014). Governments and Citizens Getting to Know Each Other? Open, Closed, and Big Data in Public Management Reform. Policy & Internet, 6(4), 393–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI377
Collier, D., & Mahoney, J. (1996). Insights and Pitfalls: Selection Bias in Qualitative Research (SSRN Scholarly Paper 1540881). [link]
De Coninck, B., Leysen, J., & Leysen, V. (2018). Public Procurement of Innovation Through Increased Startup Participation: The Case of Digipolis (Research-in-progress).
DiMaggio, P, & Powell, W.W. (1983). "The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields". American Sociological Review. 48: 148. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Dunleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public Money & Management, 14(3), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540969409387823
Dunleavy, P., & Margetts, H. (2006a). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and E-government. Oxford University Press.
Dunleavy, P., & Margetts, H. (2006b). New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
Filer, T. (2018, September 25). In Govtech Investment, Patience is a Virtue. Bennett Institute for Public Policy. [link]
Filer, T. (2019). Thinking about GovTech: A Brief Guide for Policymakers. Bennett Institute for Public Policy.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Greenway, A. (2020, September 24). The Government Digital Service truly was once world-beating. What happened? The Guardian. [link]
Hoekstra, M., Chideock, C., Bodea, G., Bharosa, N., Cave, J., Kokkeler, B., Oomens, I., Berg, A. V. D., Veenstra, A. F. V., & Alleweldt, F. (2022). The Digital Single Market and the digitalisation of the public sector.
Hoekstra, M., Van Veenstra, A. F., & Bharosa, N. (2023). Success Factors and Barriers of GovTech Ecosystems: A case study of GovTech ecosystems in the Netherlands and Lithuania. Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598500
Hoffman, R., & Yeh, C. (2018). Blitzscaling: The Lightning-Fast Path to Building Massively Valuable Companies (1st edition). HarperCollins.
Hood, C. (1995). Contemporary public management: A new global paradigm? Public Policy and Administration, 10(2), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207679501000208
House of Lords. (2017, December 12). Oral evidence—Artificial Intelligence Select Committee. [link]
House of Lords Defence Committee. (2023). It is broke—And it’s time to fix it: The UK’s defence procurement system.
Kaplan, S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2013). Temporal Work in Strategy Making. Organization Science, 24(4), 965–995. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0792
Kotecha, B., & Desmond, J. (2017). State of the UK GovTech Market: Unlocking the Potential of Startups to Solve Public Problems. PUBLIC.
Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Kalvet, T. (Eds.). (2014). Public Procurement, Innovation and Policy: International Perspectives. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40258-6
Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Kalvet, T. (2015). Quo vadis public procurement of innovation? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(3), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2015.1043245
Loader, K. (2013). Is Public Procurement a Successful Small Business Support Policy? A Review of the Evidence. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1213b
Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013). The second wave of digital-era governance: A quasi-paradigm for government on the Web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371(1987), 20120382. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382
Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2024). The political economy of digital government. Public Money and Management. [link]
Mazzucato, M., & Collington, R. (2023). The Big Con: How the Consulting Industry Weakens Our Businesses, Infantilizes Our Governments, and Warps Our Economies. Penguin Press.
Mazzucato, M., & Kattel, R. (2020). COVID-19 and public-sector capacity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(Supplement_1), S256–S269. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa031
Meier, K., & Hill, G. (2005). Bureaucracy in the Twenty-First Century. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (pp. 51–71). [link]
Meijer, A. (2015). E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001
Mergel, I., Ulrich, P., Kuziemski, & Martinez, A. (2022). Scoping GovTech dynamics in the EU. European Commission. Joint Research Centre. [link]
Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. (2003). Managing the hollow state: Collaboration and contracting. Public Management Review, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461667022000028834
NAO. (2011). Information and Communications Technology in government. Landscape Review—NAO report. [link]
NAO. (2025). Government’s approach to technology suppliers: Addressing the challenges. [link]
OECD. (2019). Digital Government Index: 2019 results (OECD Public Governance Policy Papers 03; OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, Vol. 03). https://doi.org/10.1787/4de9f5bb-en
OECD. (2024). Enabling Digital Innovation in Government: The OECD GovTech Policy Framework. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/a51eb9b2-en
Orazem, G., Mallory, G., Schlueter, M., & Werfel, D. (2017). Why Startups Don’t Bid on Government Contracts. 16.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2002). It’s About Time: Temporal Structuring in Organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.6.684.501
Pérez-Nordtvedt, L., Payne, G. T., Short, J. C., & Kedia, B. L. (2008). An entrainment-based model of temporal organizational fit, misfit, and performance. Organization Science, 19(5), 785–801. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0330
Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. (2015). When Times Collide: Temporal Brokerage at the Intersection of Markets and Developments. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 618–648. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.1004
Rhodes, R. a. W. (1994). The Hollowing Out of the State: The Changing Nature of the Public Service in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 65(2), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1994.tb00441.x
Sandra, D., Segers, J., & Giacalone, R. (2023). How organizations can benefit from entrainment: A systematic literature review. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 36(2), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-01-2022-0023
Science and Technology Committee - House of Commons. (2019). Balance and effectiveness of research and innovation spending: Government and UK Research and Innovation Responses to the Committee’s Twenty-First Report of Session 2017–19 -. [link]
Spend Network. (2015). A hard sell—Why does less than 3% of government procurement spend go to startups? [link]
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (p. 270). Sage Publications, Inc.
Taylor, H., & Viner, Z. (2021). The State of European GovTech. PUBLIC.
Wood, M. S., Bakker, R. M., & Fisher, G. (2021). Back to the Future: A Time-Calibrated Theory of Entrepreneurial Action. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0060
World Economic Forum. (2025). The Global Public Impact of GovTech. [link]
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Fifth edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nathan Davies, Keegan McBride, Moritz Kleinaltenkamp
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
