Brazilian Federal Institutions as Intermediaries
Driving Digital Transformation Through Open Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.964Keywords:
Intermediaries, Open Innovation, Digital Transformation, Case studyAbstract
The integration of Open Innovation (OI) and Digital Transformation (DT) is relevant in the public sector, particularly in developing countries where resource constraints demand innovative approaches. OI fosters collaboration between governments, businesses, academia, and civil society, enabling the co-creation of digital solutions that enhance public service efficiency and transparency. In this context, intermediaries play a fundamental role in bridging technical capabilities and institutional needs, facilitating policy implementation, and overcoming cultural and financial barriers. However, while OI and DT have been studied independently, little research has examined how intermediary-driven OI influences the digital transition in government settings. This study investigates the role of federal public institutions as intermediaries in Brazil’s OI-driven DT efforts, analyzing how they facilitate innovation adoption at the state and municipal levels. Through a case study of two federal-level institutions, the research identifies key mechanisms by which intermediaries promote digital integration and examines the challenges they face, including budget limitations and resistance to change. The findings identify the strategic role of these institutions in mitigating administrative and legal barriers and in fostering cross-sector collaboration.
Downloads
References
Al Maazmi, A., Piya, S., & Araci, Z. C. (2024). Exploring the critical success factors influencing the outcome of digital transformation initiatives in government organizations. Systems, 12(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12120524.
Androutsopoulou, A., Karacapilidis, N., Loukis, E., & Charalabidis, Y. (2017). Towards an integrated and inclusive platform for open innovation in the public sector. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 792, 228–243.
Bakici, T., Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2013). The role of public open innovation intermediaries in local government and the public sector. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(3), 311–327.
Biscotti, A. M., Mafrolla, E., Giudice, M. D., & D’Amico, E. (2018). Ceo turnover and the new leader propensity to open innovation. Management Decision, 56(6), 1348–1364.
Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., & Moedas, C. (2018). Open innovation: Research, practices, and policies. California management review, 60(2), 5–16.
Bogers, M., Zobel, A.-K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., Frederiksen, L., Gawer, A., Gruber, M., Haefliger, S., Hagedoorn, J., Hilgers, D., Laursen, K., Magnusson, M., Majchrzak, A., McCarthy, I., Moeslein, K., Nambisan, S., Piller, F., & Ter Wal, A. (2016). The open innovation research landscape: Established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24, 1–33.
Brabham, D. C. (2013). Crowdsourcing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Brockman, P., Khurana, I. K., & Zhong, R. ( (2018). Societal trust and open innovation. Research Policy, 47(10), 2048–2065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.010.
Criado, J. I., & Guevara-Gómez, A. (2021). Public sector, open innovation, and collaborative governance in lockdown times: A research of spanish cases during the covid-19 crisis. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(4), 612–626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2020-0242.
Debeljak, A., & Dečman, M. (2022). Digital transformation of slovenian urban municipalities: A quantitative report on the impact of municipality population size on digital maturity. Network of Institutes and Schools of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 15(2), 25–51.
de Lima Júnior, J. A., Gama, K., & da Silva Correia Neto, J. (2024). The use of the open innovation paradigm in the public sector: A systematic review of published studies. [link]
de Lima-Junior, J., Gama, K., & Correia-Neto, J. (2024). Open innovation for digital transformation: Opportunities and challenges at the municipal level. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 494–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3657054.3657113.
Edelmann, N., Mergel, I., & Lampoltshammer, T. (2023). Competences that foster digital transformation of public administrations: An austrian case study. Administrative Sciences, 13(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020044.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. Retrieved January 31, 2024, from [link]
Escobar, F., Almeida, W. H., & Varajão, J. (2023). Digital transformation success in the public sector: A systematic literature review of cases, processes, and success factors. 28(1), 61–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-211518.
Ferraris, A., Belyaeva, Z., & Bresciani, S. (2020). The role of universities in the smart city innovation: Multistakeholder integration and engagement perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 119, 163–171.
Figenschou, T., Li-Ying, J., Tanner, A., & Bogers, M. (2024). Open innovation in the public sector: A literature review on actors and boundaries. Technovation, 131, 102940.
Gascó, M. (2017). Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector [Open Innovation in the Public Sector]. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90–98.
Gasco-Hernandez, M., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2017). Open innovation and co-creation in the public sector: Understanding the role of intermediaries. International Conference on Electronic Participation, 140–148.
Georghiou, L., Edler, J., Uyarra, E., & Yeow, J. (2014). Policy instruments for public procurement of innovation: Choice, design and assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 86, 1–12.
Gong, Y., Yang, J., & Shi, X. (2020). Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital transformation in government: Analysis of flexibility and enterprise architecture. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3),101487.
Goulart, D., Carvalho, R., & De Castro, J. (2023). A inovação aberta como catalisadora para a transformação digital: Proposta de um framework integrativo autoria diocélio dornela goulart - diocelio@bluestars.com.br programa de pós-graduação em administração -ppga / puc minas - pontifícia universidade católica de minas gerais paex / fdc -fundação dom cabral.
Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197.
Kivleniece, I., & Quélin, B. (2011). Creating and capturing value in public-private ties: A private actor’s perspective. Academy of Management Review, 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0004.
Kraus, S., Jones, P., Kailer, N., Weinmann, A., Chaparro-Banegas, N., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2021). Digital transformation: An overview of the current state of the art of research. Sage Open, 11(3), 21582440211047576.
L., S., & D., H. (2018). Unleashing innovation beyond organizational boundaries: Exploring citizensourcing projects. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(4), 268–283.
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015, August). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (first). Jossey-Bass; 4th Revised.
Mittal, P. (2020). Impact of digital capabilities and technology skills on effectiveness of government in public services. 2020 International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry: Way Towards a Sustainable Economy (ICDABI), 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDABI51230.2020.9325647.
Mu, R., & Wang, H. (2022). A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector: Comparing barriers and governance strategies of digital and non-digital open innovation. Public Management Review, 24(4), 489–511.
Palumbo, R., Casprini, E., & Manesh, M. F. (2023). Unleashing open innovation in the public sector: A bibliometric and interpretive literature review. Management Decision, 61(13), 103–171.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
Pinto, H., Laranja, M., & Uyarra, E. (2024). Smart specialization, public authorities, and innovation intermediaries in developing regions. Regional Sustainability, 5(4), 100175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2024.100175.
Robertsone, G., & Lapiņa, I. (2023). Digital transformation as a catalyst for sustainability and open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 100017.
Runeson, P. (2012). Case study research in software engineering guidelines and examples. Wiley.
Smith, G., & Akram, A. (2017). Outbound open innovation in the public sector: The roles of intermediaries. Proceedings of the 4th Annual World Open Innovation Conference, 1–10.
Tiach, M., & Abdellatif, M. (2023). Digital transformation in public administration: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8, e02372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i10.2372.
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of business research, 122, 889–901.
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (applied social research methods). Sage publications Thousand Oaks, CA.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Joel Lima-Júnior, Kiev Gama, Jorge Correira-Neto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
