How can E-Government respond to the Digital Divide?
Two Case Studies from Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.962Keywords:
Digitalization, e-government, ICT, Digital DivideAbstract
This research explores how distinct municipal contexts in Brazil influence the design and implementation of digital public policies, focusing on two city-level digital initiatives. The study investigates the paradox of digital government efforts, which aim to enhance inclusivity and efficiency but often exacerbate the digital divide, particularly affecting underprivileged populations. This issue is significant for public administration, as understanding how local contexts shape policy outcomes is essential for creating inclusive and effective public services. Existing frameworks can fall short in addressing this puzzle because they often neglect the role of contextual variability and the necessary local adaptations to overcome digital exclusion. These frameworks overlook how sociotechnical factors specific to each locality impact user engagement and the success of digital policies. Building on this gap, we hypothesize that the adaptability of municipal governments to local demands and digital barriers is a decisive factor in user adherence and policy effectiveness. To address this question, we conducted a comparative analysis of two municipal digital initiatives: the "Ouvindo Nosso Bairro" participatory program in Salvador and the "Saúde Já Curitiba" digital health platform in Curitiba. These cases demonstrate how municipal governments have tackled digital barriers and tailored information and communication technology (ICT) solutions to meet the diverse needs of their populations. Our qualitative research design combines documentary analysis with interviews of program managers and participants. Fieldwork and primary data collection took place between October 2022 and January 2023. Using the digital divide lens, we analyze how local contexts influenced the development and outcomes of these initiatives. This study aims to contribute to the broader discourse on digital inclusivity by demonstrating how municipal governments can adapt public policies to bridge the digital divide. By offering insights into these adaptations, the research aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals, particularly those promoting inclusive and equitable societies, reducing inequalities, and fostering innovation in public administration.
Downloads
References
Acosta-Vargas, P., Novillo-Villegas, S., Salvador-Acosta, B., Calvopina, M., Kyriakidis, N., Ortiz-Prado, E., & Salvador-Ullauri, L. (2022). Accessibility analysis of worldwide COVID-19-related information portals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12102. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH191912102
Allmann, K., & Radu, R. (2023). Digital footprints as barriers to accessing e-government services. Global Policy, 14(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13140
Alston, P., United Nations Human Rights Council, Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights, & Secretariat, United Nations Human Rights Council. (2018). Report of the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights on his mission to the United States of America: Note by the Secretariat. United Nations. [link]
Baatiema, L., Sanuade, O. A., Allen, L. N., Abimbola, S., Hategeka, C., Koram, K. A., & Kruk, M. E. (2023). Health system adaptations to improve care for people living with non-communicable diseases during COVID-19 in low-middle income countries: A scoping review. Journal of Global Health, 13, 06006. [link]
Buchert, U., Kemppainen, L., Olakivi, A., Wrede, S., & Kouvonen, A. (2023). Is digitalisation of public health and social welfare services reinforcing social exclusion? The case of Russian-speaking older migrants in Finland. Critical Social Policy, 43(3), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221105035
Catalina-García, B., & Galera, M. D. C. G. (2003). Innovation and hi-tech tools in journalism education: The Wooclap case. Doxa Comunicación. Revista Interdisciplinar de Estudios de Comunicación y Ciencias Sociales, 2022(34), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.31921/DOXACOM.N34A1141
Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2018). Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal 2018 84:1, 84(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10708-018-9845-8
CGI.br. (2024). Pesquisa sobre o uso das tecnologias de informação e comunicação nos domicílios brasileiros: TIC Domicílios 2024.
Cunha, M. A., Coelho, T. R., & Pozzebon, M. (2013). The Use Of ICT In Public Decision-Making Participation. European Conference on Information Systems.
Figueiredo, B. A. de, Przeybilovicz, E., & Cunha, M. A. (2023). Citizen Participation Level in Smart Governance: A Literature Review. AMCIS 2023 Proceedings. [link]
Gabinete do Prefeito Municipal do Salvador. (2018, March 20). Lei Ordinária 9358 2018 de Salvador BA. [link]
Grönlund, Å., & Horan, T. A. (2005). Communications of the Association for Information Systems Communications of the Association for Information Systems Introducing e-Gov: History, Definitions, and Issues Introducing e-Gov: History, Definitions, and Issues. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01539
Heeks, R. (2001). Understanding e-Governance for Development. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3540058
Kim, K. K., McGrath, S. P., Lopez Solorza, J., & Lindeman, D. (2023). CIC 2022: The ACTIVATE Digital Health Pilot Program for diabetes and hypertension in an underserved and rural community. Applied Clinical Informatics, 14(4), 644–653. https://doi.org/10.1055/A-2096-0326/id/jr202301ra0017-37/bib
Lindgren, I., Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Melin, U. (2019). Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2019.03.002
Macaya, J. F. M., Ribeiro, M. M., Jereissati, T., dos Reis Lima, C., & Cunha, M. A. (2021). Gendering the digital divide: The use of electronic government services and implications for the digital gender gap. Information Polity, 26(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-200307
Madsen, C. O., Berger, J. B., & Phythian, M. (2014). The Development in Leading e-Government Articles 2001-2010: Definitions, Perspectives, Scope, Research Philosophies, Methods and Recommendations: An Update of Heeks and Bailur. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8653 LNCS, 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9_2
Matos, E. O., Barros, S., & Carreiro, R. (2019). “Ouvindo nosso bairro”: Um estudo sobre a participação política local por meio de multiplataformas. In M. G. Massuchin, E. U. Cervi, F. Cavassana, & C. Q. Tavares (Eds.), Comunicação e política: Interfaces em esferas regionais (pp. 203–227). EDUFMA. [link]
Medaglia, R., & Damsgaard, J. (2020). Blockchain and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: Towards an agenda for IS research. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS).
Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2015). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance: International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
Meijer, A. J., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Smart City Research: Contextual Conditions, Governance Models, and Public Value Assessment. Social Science Computer Review, 34(6), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315618890
Muñoz, L. A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2021). Different Levels of Smart and Sustainable Cities Construction Using e-Participation Tools in European and Central Asian Countries. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 3561, 13(6), 3561. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13063561
OGM - Ouvidoria Geral do Município. (2021). Programa Salvador Bairro a Bairro. OGM - Ouvidoria Geral do Município. [link]
Panganiban, G. G. F. (2018). E-governance in agriculture: digital tools enabling Filipino farmers. [link], 12(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2018.1499479
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4ª ed.). [link]
Prefeitura Municipal do Salvador. (2021). Salvador PPA 2022-2025. [link]
Przeybilovicz, E., & Cunha, M. A. (2024). Governing in the digital age: The emergence of dynamic smart urban governance modes. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101907. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2023.101907
Przeybilovicz, E., Cunha, M. A., Geertman, S., Leleux, C., Michels, A., Tomor, Z., Webster, C. W. R., & Meijer, A. (2022). Citizen participation in the smart city: findings from an international comparative study. Local Government Studies, 48(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1851204
Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELE.2017.07.007
Schou, J., & Hjelholt, M. (2019). Digitalizing the welfare state: Citizenship discourses in Danish digitalization strategies from 2002 to 2015. Critical Policy Studies, 13(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2017.1333441
Schou, J., & Pors, A. S. (2019). Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare. Social Policy & Administration, 53(3), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/SPOL.12470
Schwal, M. A. (2022). El confinamiento y la vuelta a clases en Argentina: Relatos de docentes sobre la desigualdad en pandemia. Texto Livre, 15, e38009. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2022.38009
Secretaria de Comunicação (SECOM). (2021a). Prefeitura inicia obras mais votadas no Ouvindo Nosso Bairro 2021 – Prefeitura Bairro. Prefeitura de Salvador. [link]
Secretaria de Comunicação (SECOM). (2021b). Primeira etapa do Ouvindo Nosso Bairro registra 21 mil solicitações – Prefeitura Bairro. Prefeitura de Salvador. [link]
Secretaria Geral de Articulação Comunitária e Prefeituras-Bairro. (n.d.). Ouvindo Nosso Bairro - Salvador. Retrieved January 23, 2023, from [link]
Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Curitiba. (2023a). Histórico da Secretaria. Prefeitura Municipal de Curitiba. [link]
Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Curitiba. (2023b). Rede de serviços do SUS Curitiba. Prefeitura Municipal de Curitiba. [link]
Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Curitiba. (2023c). Plano Municipal de Saúde de Curitiba 2022-2025. Prefeitura Municipal de Curitiba. [link]
Spink, P. K. (2008). O pesquisador conversador no cotidiano. Psicologia & Sociedade, 20(Edição Especial), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-71822008000400010
Spink, P., Lotta, G., & Burgos, F. (2021). Institutional vulnerability and trust in public agencies: Views from both sides of the street. Governance, 34(4), 1057–1073. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12574
Tomor, Z., Meijer, A., Michels, A., & Geertman, S. (2019). Smart Governance For Sustainable Cities: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review. [link], 26(4), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.1651178
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2019.01.001
United Nations (UN) Brazil. (n.d.). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Retrieved November 7, 2024, from [link]
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online? 10, 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002
Welby, B., & Tan, E. (2022). OECD Going Digital Toolkit Policy Note: Designing and delivering public services in the digital age. OECD. [link]
Zhang, B., Peng, G., Liu, C., Zhang, Z. J., & Jasimuddin, S. M. (2022). Adaptation behaviour in using one-stop smart governance apps: An exploratory study between digital immigrants and digital natives. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 1971–1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00538-y/tables/2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bruno Andrade de Figueiredo, Manuela Cortez da Cunha Cruz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
