What drives local governments’ digital transformation in Brazil?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.961Keywords:
Digital Transformation, Local Governments, Brazil, Fiscal Autonomy, Education, Regional DisparitiesAbstract
In the context of increasing demands for efficient and equitable public service delivery, digital transformation has become essential for local governments, particularly within federations marked by inequality. This study investigates the factors driving digital transformation in Brazilian municipalities—a country with significant regional disparities and varying administrative capacities. The objective is to identify which economic and technical-administrative variables influence the digital maturity of local governments. Using data from 4,265 municipalities collected in 2023, the study constructs a Digital Transformation Index encompassing technological infrastructure and digital service provision. Multiple linear regression models assess the relationship between digital transformation and variables such as fiscal autonomy, IT expenditures, bureaucratic quality, and mayors’ educational profiles. Results indicate that municipal revenue generation and IT spending positively correlate with digital transformation, while reliance on intergovernmental transfers is negatively associated. Additionally, better-educated civil servants and mayors are more likely to lead digitally advanced municipalities. However, when accounting for regional and population size controls, many of these associations lose statistical significance, underscoring the role of broader structural disparities. The findings suggest that economic and human resource capacity are important but insufficient alone; a more coordinated national strategy is necessary to reduce regional inequalities and support local digital transformation.
Downloads
References
Aguerre, C., & Bonina, C. (2024). Open government, civic tech and digital platforms in Latin America: A governance study of Montevideo’s urban app ‘Por Mi Barrio’. Information Systems Journal, 34(4), 1037–1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12468
Alam, K., Ali, M. A., Erdiaw-Kwasie, M. O., Murray, P. A., & Wiesner, R. (2022). Digital Transformation among SMEs: Does Gender Matter? Sustainability, 14(1), 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010535
Alves, P. J. H. F., & Araujo, J. M. (2024). The effects of intergovernmental transfers on the local fiscal incentives of Brazilian municipalities. Journal of Government and Economics, 13, 100104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jge.2024.100104
Branderhorst, E. M., & Ruijer, E. (2024). Digital leadership in local government: An empirical study of Dutch city managers. Local Government Studies, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2024.2363368
Budding, T., Faber, B., & Gradus, R. (2018). Assessing electronic service delivery in municipalities: Determinants and financial consequences of e-government implementation. Local Government Studies, 44(5), 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1473768
CGI.BR – Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil. (2023). Pesquisa sobre o uso das tecnologias de informação e comunicação no setor público brasileiro—TIC Governo Eletrônico 2023 [Dataset].
Criado, J. I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019). Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies: From digital services to artificial intelligence and beyond. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(5), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0178
Decreto no 12.069, de 21 de Junho de 2024. Dispõe sobre a Estratégia Nacional de Governo Digital e a Rede Nacional de Governo Digital – Rede Gov.br e institui a Estratégia Nacional de Governo Digital para o período de 2024 a 2027., 12.069 (2024). [link]
Epstein, B. (2022). Two decades of e-government diffusion among local governments in the United States. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101665
Faber, B., Budding, T., & Gradus, R. (2020). Assessing social media use in Dutch municipalities: Political, institutional, and socio-economic determinants. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101484
Fan, B., & Pan, T. (2023). Does information technology–organizational resource interaction affect E-government performance? Moderating roles of environmental uncertainty. Government Information Quarterly, 40(3), 101830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101830
Fan, Z., Christensen, T., & Ma, L. (2023). Policy attention and the adoption of public sector innovation. Public Management Review, 25(10), 1815–1834. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2050283
Fan, Z., Meng, Q., & Wei, N. (2020). Fiscal slack or environmental pressures: Which matters more for technological innovation assimilation? A configurational approach. International Public Management Journal, 23(3), 380–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2019.1647318
Filgueiras, F., Flávio, C., & Palotti, P. (2019). Digital Transformation and Public Service Delivery in Brazil. Latin American Policy, 10(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12169
Grin, E. J., & Abrucio, F. L. (2021). O elo perdido da descentralização no Brasil: A promoção das capacidades estatais municipais pelo governo federal. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 29(77), e002. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987321297702
Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024). Digitally-induced change in the public sector: A systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 26(7), 1963–1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917
Hilhorst, C., Behrens, C., Brouwer, E., & Sneller, L. (2022). Efficiency gains in public service delivery through information technology in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101724
Hong, S., Kim, S. H., & Kwon, M. (2022). Determinants of digital innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101723
Janssen, M., Chun, S. A., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2009). Building the next generation of digital government infrastructures. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.006
Marenco, A., & Cate, L. T. (2021). Municípios são todos iguais? Decisões sobre gasto, orçamento e políticas públicas em governos locais. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 29(77), e001. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987321297701
Medeiros, H. A. V., Figueiredo, D., Lima, M. T. A. de, Lucena, P. M. P. de, & Souza, L. S. de O. (2023). Construção de Indicadores Sintéticos para Tomada de Decisão em Governo: Um tutorial. 16o Congresso de Gestão Pública do Rio Grande do Norte, 1–12.
Melin, U., Madsen, C. Ø., & Larsson, K. K. (2024). Five Bureaucratic Roles in the Age of Digital Transformation – Insights from Scandinavian Public Organizations. Em M. Janssen, J. Crompvoets, J. R. Gil-Garcia, H. Lee, I. Lindgren, A. Nikiforova, & G. Viale Pereira (Orgs.), Electronic Government (Vol. 14841, p. 99–115). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70274-7_7
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Mukhopadhyay, S., Bouwman, H., & Jaiswal, M. P. (2019). An open platform centric approach for scalable government service delivery to the poor: The Aadhaar case. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.001
Onozaka, Y., & Nemoto, K. (2023). Digital Transformation, Leadership, and Gender Equality: Are They Related? Em A. Khare & W. W. Baber (Orgs.), Adopting and Adapting Innovation in Japan’s Digital Transformation (p. 155–173). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0321-4_10
O’Reilly, T. (2011). Government as a Platform. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 6(1), 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00056
Osah, J., & Pade-Khene, C. (2020). E-government strategy formulation in resource-constrained local government in South Africa. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 17(4), 426–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1715907
Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012466935
Panagiotopoulos, P., Klievink, B., & Cordella, A. (2019). Public value creation in digital government. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421
Przeybilovicz, E., Cunha, M. A., & Meirelles, F. D. S. (2018). O uso da tecnologia da informação e comunicação para caracterizar os municípios: Quem são e o que precisam para desenvolver ações de governo eletrônico e smart city. Revista de Administração Pública, 52(4), 630–649. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612170582
Reddick, C. G. (2006). Information Resource Managers and E-government Effectiveness: A Survey of Texas State Agencies. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.006
Ruano De La Fuente, J. M. (2014). E-Government Strategies in Spanish Local Governments. Local Government Studies, 40(4), 600–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.787414
Salim, T. A., El Barachi, M., Mohamed, A. A. D., Halstead, S., & Babreak, N. (2022). The mediator and moderator roles of perceived cost on the relationship between organizational readiness and the intention to adopt blockchain technology. Technology in Society, 71, 102108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102108
Savoldelli, A., Codagnone, C., & Misuraca, G. (2014). Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption. Government Information Quarterly, 31, S63–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008
Scholta, H., Mertens, W., Kowalkiewicz, M., & Becker, J. (2019). From one-stop shop to no-stop shop: An e-government stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.010
Segatto, C. I., Santos, F. B. P. D., Bichir, R. M., & Morandi, E. L. (2022). Inequalities and the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: Analyzing un-coordinated responses in social assistance and education. Policy and Society, 41(2), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puac005
Siqueira, É. S., Araujo, M. H. de, Souza, C. A. de, & Reinhard, N. (2015). Análise multivariada com dados binários e sua potencial aplicação na área de tecnologia da informação e comunicação. Encontro de Administração da Informação - EnADI.
Stier, S. (2015). Political determinants of e-government performance revisited: Comparing democracies and autocracies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.004
Welch, E. W., & Feeney, M. K. (2014). Technology in government: How organizational culture mediates information and communication technology outcomes. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 506–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.006
Wilson, C., & Mergel, I. (2022). Overcoming barriers to digital government: Mapping the strategies of digital champions. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101681
Yun, H. J., & Opheim, C. (2010). Building on Success: The Diffusion of e-Government in the American States. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 8(1), 1–12.
Zhu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Diffusion of Marketization Innovation with Administrative Centralization in a Multilevel System: Evidence from China. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy034
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lizandro Lui, Rafael Barbosa de Aguiar, Lídia Nicole dos Santos ten Cate, Samuel de Melo Barbosa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
