Crowdsourcing in Municipal Ombudsman Offices
A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.959Keywords:
Systematic Literature Review, Ombudsman, Crowdsourcing, E-participation, Electronic GovernmentAbstract
Municipal ombudsman offices face challenges in managing increasing citizen demands and stimulating meaningful participation, despite legal frameworks guaranteeing citizen rights. Crowdsourcing presents a potential avenue to improve the efficiency of the Ombudsman office and the engagement of citizens. This systematic literature review (SLR) investigates the application of crowdsourcing in municipal ombudsman offices, synthesizing existing research to identify best practices, challenges, and research gaps. A comprehensive search of academic databases from 2010 to 2023 initially yielded 1590 papers. Following a rigorous five-stage filtering process, 24 relevant studies were selected for in-depth analysis. The findings reveal a growing trend of utilizing crowdsourcing primarily for feedback collection and complaint management, although its application in direct decision-making processes within ombudsman offices remains limited. While the literature reports benefits such as increased efficiency and faster problem resolution, significant challenges persist. These include digital inequality, which can exclude vulnerable populations; concerns about the credibility of citizen-submitted data; and institutional resistance to adopting new, crowdsourced approaches. This review indicates the need for further research into the long-term impacts of crowdsourcing on citizen empowerment and ombudsman office accountability. The study provides a valuable foundation for researchers and practitioners seeking to leverage crowdsourcing to strengthen municipal ombudsman services and promote citizen participation, emphasizing the importance of addressing these identified challenges to realize the full potential of crowdsourcing in this context.
Downloads
References
Adenskog, M., Åström, J., Ertiö, T., Karlsson, M., Ruoppila, S., & Thiel, S.-K. (2017). Balancing potential and risk: The living lab approach in mobile participation research. Electronic Participation: 9th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, ePart 2017, St. Petersburg, Russia, September 4-7, 2017, Proceedings 9, 12–23.
Alenezy, F. A., & Akhlaq, M. (2023). Fix-it: Design and implementation of a public complaint management system. 2023 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology and Engineering (IC-CoSITE), 858–862.
Alizadeh, T., Sarkar, S., & Burgoyne, S. (2019). Capturing citizen voice online: Enabling smart participatory local government. Cities, 95, 102400.
Antero, S. (2014). Evaluating the participatory potential of the brazilian active model in the federal executive branch: An implementation perspective (2014).
Apleni, A., & Smuts, H. (2020). An e-government implementation framework: A developing country case study. Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology: 19th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2020, Skukuza, South Africa, April 6–8, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 19, 15–27.
Ávila, T. J. T., Santos, D. G. d., & de Oliveira, R. S. (2022). Intergovernmental relations in the implementation of the public service user defense code in brazil: State capabilities and institutional arrangements. DG. O 2022: The 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 425–436.
Basili, V. R., Caldiera, G., & Rombach, H. D. (1994). Goal, question metric paradigm. encyclopedia of software engineering, vol. 1.
Batalli, M. (2015). Role of ombudsman institution over the administration. Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences, 1(3).
Bernardes, M. B., de Andrade, F. P., Novais, P., & Lopes, N. V. (2018). Participatory governance of smart cities: A study upon portuguese and brazilian government portals. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 526–536.
Bonacin, R., Melo, A. M., Simoni, C. A., & Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2010). Accessibility and interoperability in e-government systems: Outlining an inclusive development process. Universal Access in the Information Society, 9, 17–33.
Boudjelida, A., Mellouli, S., & Lee, J. (2016). Electronic citizens participation: Systematic review. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, 31–39.
Bouzguenda, I., Alalouch, C., & Fava, N. (2019). Towards smart sustainable cities: A review of the role digital citizen participation could play in advancing social sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101627.
Certomà, C., & Rizzi, F. (2017). Crowdsourcing processes for citizen-driven governance. Citizen empowerment and innovation in the data-rich city, 57–77.
Cho, J.-S., & Chun, S. A. (2011). Towards transparent policy decision making process: A case study for seoul metropolitan government. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 219–224.
Comparato, B. K. (2005). As ouvidorias de polícia no brasil: Controle e participação. PhD diss., Universidade de São Paulo.
da Silva, L. C. B., Loureiro, A. C., Magoni, F. M., & Gonçalves, V. M. B. (2022). Active methodologies and digital technologies in learning: A systematic literature review. 2022 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 1–5.
de Azambuja, L. S., Lheureux-De-Freitas, J., Moreira, C. R., & Macadar, M. A. (2014). A smart city initiative: A case study of porto alegre 156. Proceedings of the 15th annual international conference on digital government research, 245–252.
Durachman, Y., Harahap, D., Rodoni, A., Bakti, A. M. F., Mansoer, M., et al. (2020). Analysis of factors that affect the quality of e-government services: A case study in ombudsman of the republic of indonesia. 2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), 1–7.
Estellés-Arolas, E., & González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F. (2012). Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information science, 38(2), 189–200.
Faber, A., & Budding, G. (2018). How to be open about spending: Innovating in public sector reporting in the information age. Information Technology Science, 137–147.
Garrigos-Simon, F. J., Gil-Pechuán, I., & Estelles-Miguel, S. (2015). Advances in crowdsourcing. Springer. Grönlund, Å. (2004). State of the art in e-gov research–a survey. International Conference on Electronic Government, 178–185.
Grossman, G., Platas, M. R., & Rodden, J. (2018). Crowdsourcing accountability: Ict for service delivery. World Development, 112, 74–87.
Hammon, L., & Hippner, H. (2012). Crowdsourcing. Business & Information systems engineering, 4, 163–166. Hassan, L., & Hamari, J. (2019). Gamification of e-participation: A literature review.
Howe, J., et al. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired magazine, 14(6), 176–183.
Ingrams, A. (2018). Public values in the age of big data: A public information perspective. policy and internet, 11 (2), 128–148.
Juk, Y., Valotto, D., Lanza, B., & Jose Tavares Avila, T. (2021). An overview of on-site contact centers in subnational governments in brazil. DG. O2021: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 363–375.
Karkin, N., & Janssen, M. (2020). Structural changes driven by e-petitioning technology: Changing the relationship between the central government and local governments. Information Technology for Development, 26(4), 837–855.
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering.
Lanza, B. B. B., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Gimenez, F. A. P. (2017). Understanding the potential of mobile government in developing countries: The case of short message service (sms) use by a brazilian state government. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 436–445.
Maciel, C., Cappelli, C., Slaviero, C., & Garcia, A. C. B. (2016). Technologies for popular participation: A research agenda. Proceedings of the 17th international digital government research conference on digital government research, 202–211.
Matheus, R., Ribeiro, M. M., Vaz, J. C., & de Souza, C. A. (2010). Internet use for social control and participation: What are local governments doing in latin america? Proceedings of the 4th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance, 333–338.
Matos, E., BB Lanza, B., & D. Lara, R. (2021). Mobile government in states: Exploratory research on the development of mobile apps by the brazilian subnational government. DG. O2021: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 351–362.
Mourão, E., Pimentel, J. F., Murta, L., Kalinowski, M., Mendes, E., & Wohlin, C. (2020). On the performance of hybrid search strategies for systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 123, 106294.
Noh, I. H. (2022). Crowdsourcing platform acting as an intermediary role in collaborative governance. DG. O 2022: The 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 474–476.
Pathmanathan, P., & Poulier, R. (2017). A comprehensive citizen engagement framework for effective resolution of public complaints in cities. 2017 International Conference On Smart Technologies For Smart Nation (SmartTechCon), 1128–1133.
Phatak, S. A. (2017). 14 public complaint handling process and the usage of ict in public sector: An exploratory study of ombudsman sector of pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences.
Pincovsky, M., Falcão, A., Nunes, W. N., Furtado, A. P., & Cunha, R. C. (2021). Machine learning applied to credit analysis: A systematic literature review. 2021 16th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 1–5.
Polovchenko, K. A. (2019). Role of ombudsman in human rights protection in a contemporary state. Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, (35), 637–665.
Przeybilovicz, E., da Silva, W. V., & Cunha, M. A. (2014). Profile of the municipalities of paraná state, brazil, concerning ict infrastructure and use: A cluster analysis. Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 290–299.
Quintão, T. T. (2016). Parliamentary ombudsman (ouvidoria) and its democratic potential: The brazilian case. Politikon: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science, 31, 5–25.
Relyea, H. C. (2002). E-gov: Introduction and overview. Government information quarterly, 19(1), 9–35.
Ribeiro, M. M., Cunha, M. A., & Barbosa, A. F. (2018). E-participation, social media and digital gap: Challenges in the brazilian context. Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on digital government research: Governance in the data age, 1–9.
Sánchez, D. Á., Gimilio, D. P., & Altamirano, J. I. (2015). Crowdsourcing: A new way to citizen emporwermen. Advances in crowdsourcing. London: Springer, 73–86.
Seidel, N. (2019). Democratic power structures in virtual communities. Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, 1–8.
Sharma, S., Kumar Kar, A., & Gupta, M. (2021). Unpacking digital accountability: Ensuring efficient and answerable e-governance service delivery. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 260–269.
Simonofski, A., Serral Asensio, E., De Smedt, J., & Snoeck, M. (2019). Hearing the voice of citizens in smart city design: The citivoice framework. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61, 665–678.
Simonofski, A., Snoeck, M., Vanderose, B., Crompvoets, J., & Habra, N. (2017). Reexamining e-participation: Systematic literature review on citizen participation in e-government service delivery. AMCIS.
Villao, D., Vera, G., Duque, V., & Mazón, L. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of digital transformation in the public sector: The case of ecuador. International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, 3–15.
Zahn, J., Mourão, E., Bernardini, F., Maciel, C., & Viterbo, J. (2024). Mapping the communication channels in the general ombudsman offices of state capitals in brazil. In Á. Rocha, C. Ferrás, J. Hochstetter Diez, & M. Diéguez Rebolledo (Eds.), Information technology and systems (pp. 435–445). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Zahn, J., Viterbo, J., Maciel, C., & Bernardini, F. (2024). A framework for implanting citizen-sourcing platforms in municipal ombudsman offices. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 542–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3657054.3657118.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Versions
- 2025-05-26 (2)
- 2025-05-20 (1)
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jean Zahn, Erica Muorão, José Viterbo, Christiano Maciel, Flávia Bernardini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
