AI drifting and converting emergency policies
An institutional theory perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.949Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, emergency policies, policy change, COVID-19 pandemic, drift, conversionAbstract
The impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on emergency policies has been widely examined in digital government literature, focusing primarily on AI’s role in policy design and delivery and on its effects on policy outcomes. However, limited attention has been given to how AI directly impacts emergency policies’ change, that is, in which ways AI reshapes and steers the policies it mediates. Drawing on Hacker et al. (2015) framework of institutional change, particularly the concepts of drift and conversion, this research provides a novel lens to understand policy change in emergency contexts. Drift occurs when policies remain formally unchanged but fail to adapt to evolving contexts, altering their effects. Conversion refers to the redirection of policies towards new purposes without modifying their formal structure. By applying this framework, the paper investigates AI’s dual role in changing emergency policies, both as a source of resistance to formal policy change and a catalyst for policy redirection. The research adopts an explanatory case study of Peru’s welfare policies during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the use of the SISFOH AI system to allocate emergency subsidies. Findings demonstrate how AI changes the policies it mediates by drifting formal policy modification and enabling conversion by reshaping policy ends. This paper contributes to the digital government literature by highlighting AI’s ambivalent role in emergency policy change and offering fresh insights into the intersection of AI and emergency policies.
Downloads
References
Agarwal, P., Swami, S., & Malhotra, S. K. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Adoption in the Post COVID-19 New-Normal and Role of Smart Technologies in Transforming Business: a Review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 15(3), 506-529. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-08-2021-0122
Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lema, M. D. (2021). New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery. Public Money & Management, 41(1), 69-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1764206
Anshari, M., Hamdan, M., Ahmad, N., Ali, E., & Haidi, H. (2023). COVID-19, artificial intelligence, ethical challenges and policy implications. AI & SOCIETY, 38(2), 707-720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01471-6
Avgerou, C. (2004). IT as an institutional actor in developing countries. In S. Krishna & S. Madon (Eds.), The digital challenge: Information technology in the development context (pp. 46-63). Ashgate Publishing.
Caplan, R., & boyd, d. (2018). Isomorphism through algorithms: Institutional dependencies in the case of Facebook. Big Data & Society, 5(1), 2053951718757253. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718757253
Cerna Aragon, D. (2021). On not being visibile to the state: The case of Peru. In S. Milan, E. Treré, & S. Masiero (Eds.), COVID-19 from the margins. Pandemic invisibilities, policies and resistance in the datafied society (pp. 282). Institute of Network Cultures.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory. SAGE.
Ciborra, C. U., & Hanseth, O. (2000). Introduction: From Control to Drift. In C. U. Ciborra & Associates (Eds.), From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures (pp. 1-12). Oxford University Press.
Contraloria General de la Republica del Perù, t. (2020). “Formulacion y aprobacion del padron de los hogares beneficiarios del subsidio monetario en el marco del decreto de urgencia n° 027-2020”. San Isidro (Perù)
Cordella, A., & Gualdi, F. (2024). Algorithmic formalization: Impacts on administrative processes. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.13030
Firmino, R., & Evangelista, R. (2023). Pandemic techno-politics in the Global South. Information Polity, 28(4), 453-467. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-211514
Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Brookings Institution Press.
Hacker, J. S., Pierson, P., & Thelen, K. (2015). Drift and conversion: hidden faces of institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis (pp. 180-208). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316273104.008
Hagen, L., Sandoval-Almazan, R., Okhuijsen, S., Cabaco, S., Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E. A., Villodre, J., Sung, W., & Valle-Cruz, D. (2021). Open Government and Open Data in Times of COVID-19 Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Omaha, NE, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3463677.3463740
Hansen, H., Elias, S. R. S. T. A., Stevenson, A., Smith, A. D., Alexander, B. N. B., & Barros, M. (2025). Resisting the Objectification of Qualitative Research: The Unsilencing of Context, Researchers, and Noninterview Data. Organizational Research Methods, 28(1), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281231215119
Kummitha, R. K. R. (2020). Smart technologies for fighting pandemics: The techno- and human-driven approaches in controlling the virus transmission. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101481
Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6), 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976
Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2011). Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-Government phenomena. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 329-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.08.007
Lundgren, M., Klamberg, M., Sundström, K., & Dahlqvist, J. (2020). Emergency powers in response to COVID-19: Policy diffusion, democracy, and preparedness. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 38(4), 305-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2021.1899406
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734-749. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840
Meijer, A., & Webster, C. W. R. (2020). The COVID-19 crisis and the information polity: An overview of responses and discussions in twenty-one countries from six continents. Information Polity, 25(3), 243-274. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-200006
Mhlanga, D. (2022). The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: What Lessons Are We Learning on 4IR and the Sustainable Development Goals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1879. [link]
Milan, S., Treré, E., & Masiero, S. (2021). COVID-19 from the Margins. Pandemic invisibilities, policies and resistance in the datafied society (Vol. 40). Institute of Network Cultures.
Moser-Plautz, B., & Schmidthuber, L. (2023). Digital government transformation as an organizational response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Government Information Quarterly, 40(3), 101815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101815
Nasseef, O. A., Baabdullah, A. M., Alalwan, A. A., Lal, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based public healthcare systems: G2G knowledge-based exchange to enhance the decision-making process. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101618
Naudé, W., & Vinuesa, R. (2021). Data deprivations, data gaps and digital divides: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 20539517211025545. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211025545
Pierson, P. (2006). Public Policies as Institutions. In I. Shapiro, S. Skowronek, & D. Galvin (Eds.), Rethinking political institutions: the art of the State (pp. 114–131). NYU Press.
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (2012). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Qureshi, S. (2021). Pandemics within the pandemic: Confronting socio-economic inequities in a datafied world. Information Technology for Development, 27(2), 151-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1911020
Rodriguez-Hidalgo, C. (2020). Using functional and social robots to help during the COVID-19 pandemic. In A. Plaw, B. Gurgel, & D. Plascencia (Eds.), The Politics of Technology in Latin America: Data Protection, Homeland Security and the Labor Market (1st ed., pp. 218). Routledge.
Rudko, I., Bashirpour Bonab, A., Fedele, M., & Formisano, A. V. (2024). New institutional theory and AI: toward rethinking of artificial intelligence in organizations. Journal of Management History, 31(2), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-09-2023-0097
Scholl, H. J. (2023). The Past Two Decades in Disaster Information Management: Academic Contributors and Topical Evolution. Proceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2023.230
Silva Huerta, R. C., & Stampini, M. (2018). ¿Cómo funciona el Programa Juntos?: Mejores prácticas en la implementación de programas de transferencias monetarias condicionadas en América Latina y el Caribe. Inter American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0001144
Urueña, R. (2023). Regulating the Algorithmic Welfare State in Latin America. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law & International Law (MPIL). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4670480
Valle-Cruz, D., & Sandoval-Almazán, R. (2024). Role and Governance of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Policy Cycle. In J. B. Bullock, Y.-C. Chen, J. Himmelreich, V. M. Hudson, A. Korinek, M. M. Young, & B. Zhang (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance (pp. 534–550). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Yu, H.-T., Chiu, Y., Chen, H.-M., Chu, D., Yi, T.-H., Lee, D., & Chao, S.-L. (2024). COVID-19 Control and Prevention in Taipei: A Data-Driven Approach: Utilizing data on pandemic prevention. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Taipei, Taiwan. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657054.3657087
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Francesco Gualdi, Vincent Ong
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
