A Comparative Study on Judicial Visualization in the U.S. and China

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.929

Keywords:

Judicial statistics, Judicial visualization, Judicial comparison between China and the United States, Judicial openness

Abstract

The visualization of judicial statistics is a new form of judicial openness in the era of big data, which is of great significance for the public to understand judicial dynamics and maintain judicial fairness. The study finds that neither the Supreme Court of China nor the U.S. Supreme Court provides a dashboard of judicial statistics, but the frequency of data updates in the United States is quarterly, and in China, it is updated in the form of annual reports. Among the court web portals of 35 provinces (including Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan) in China, only 3 courts provide visualization of judicial statistics. Among the 51 state court web portals in the United States, 18 courts conduct visualization of judicial statistics. For dg.o attendees, this research offers unique insights into how the two countries approach the challenge of making judicial data accessible and understandable to the public.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brandeis, L. D. (2009). Other people's money and how the bankers use it. Cosimo, Inc..(pp.92). [link]

Ahmed, R. K., Ahmed, O., Pappel, I., Reitsakas, A., & Draheim, D. (2022). The role of digital transformation in fostering transparency: An e-Court system case study. In Conference on Business, e-Services and e-Society (pp. 219-230). Springer.

Marković, M., & Gostojić, S. (2020). Open judicial data: A comparative analysis. Social Science Computer Review, 38(3), 295-314.

Weinshall, K. , & Epstein, L. . (2020). Developing high-quality data infrastructure for legal analytics: introducing the Israeli supreme court database. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies(4).

Gerichtsportal. (n.d.). Gerichtsportal. [link]. Last accessed March 29, 2025.

UK Government. Ministry of Justice. (n.d.). Ministry of Justice. [link]. Last accessed March 29, 2025.

Rechtspraak. (n.d.). Rechtspraak: The Judiciary of the Netherlands. [link]. Last accessed March 29, 2025.

Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel. (n.d.). Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel. [link]. Last accessed March 29, 2025.

Federal Department of Justice and Police. (n.d.). Statistics. [link]. Last accessed March 29, 2025.

Ministerio de Justicia. (n.d.). Ministerio de Justicia. [link]. Last accessed March 29, 2025.

Zhejiang Provincial Government. (n.d.). Zhejiang judicial information. [link]. Last accessed December 5, 2024.

Sarikaya, A., Correll, M., Bartram, L., & al., et. (2018). What do we talk about when we talk about dashboards? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25(1), 682-692. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865165

Judiciary of Macao. (n.d.). Statistics. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Beijing Courts. (n.d.). Court statistics. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Power BI. (n.d.). Dashboard details. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Tableau. (n.d.). Data visualizations by drap4687. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

California Courts. (n.d.). Court dashboard. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (n.d.). Dashboard. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Illinois Courts. (n.d.). Pretrial resources. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

New Jersey Courts. (n.d.). Public report statistics: Current filings and resolutions. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Texas Courts. (n.d.). Bail dashboard. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Power BI. (n.d.). Dashboard details. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Pennsylvania Courts. (n.d.). Research and statistics: Dashboard table of contents. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Ohio Supreme Court. (n.d.). Court dashboards. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Georgia Courts. (n.d.). Data and statistics. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

North Carolina Courts. (n.d.). Dashboard: Current fiscal year. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Florida Courts. (n.d.). Publications and statistics: Statistics. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Arizona Courts. (n.d.). Interactive data dashboards. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Michigan Courts. (n.d.). Interactive court data dashboard. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Oklahoma Department of Human Services. (n.d.). Judicial dashboard region. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Kentucky Courts. (n.d.). Caseload monthly by category. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Idaho Court Data. (n.d.). Charge. [link]. Last accessed March 30, 2025.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-05-19 — Updated on 2025-08-07

Versions

How to Cite

Zhou, J., Miao, C., & Long, Y. (2025). A Comparative Study on Judicial Visualization in the U.S. and China. Conference on Digital Government Research, 26. https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.929 (Original work published May 19, 2025)