Using ICT to Patch the Shortcomings of New Public Management in a Post-Communist Welfare State
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.1062Keywords:
algorithmic/automated decision making (ADM), elderly care, New Public Analytics (NPA), New Public Management (NPM), welfare stateAbstract
New Public Management approach in the welfare sector led to outsourcing and disaggregation of the services, which makes it difficult to implement new ICT technologies into such context. In this paper, I analyse the case of Electronic Care System (ECS) implemented in selected municipalities in Poland. These municipalities carry different characteristics of inhabitants and service provision. Additionally, Polish welfare system is a case of transformative system which is a mix of diverse European systems. I analyse secondary data (documents, strategies), interviews and observations regarding the implementation of ECS. Based on that, I draw the main conclusions regarding how context of welfare provision impedes the successful implementation of the ICT within the public institutions. I argue that introduction of ICT in fragmented institutions needs to include diverse perspectives of stakeholders and take into account the values important for the system users. Especially, I focus on how diverse modes of care provision need to be mirrored in the systems, how political and managerial pressures make it more difficult for other actors to navigate through the change. At the end, I ask the question about organisational and cognitive costs of implementing innovations.
Downloads
References
Alston, P. (2019). Report of the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. [link]
Anttiroiko, A.-V., & Valkama, P. (2016). Post-NPM-style service integration: Partnership-based brokerage in elderly care. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(7), 675–689. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2015-0220
Broomfield, H., & Reutter, L. (2022). In search of the citizen in the datafication of public administration. Big Data & Society, 9(1), 20539517221089302. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221089302
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). Democracy and administrative policy: Contrasting elements of New Public Management (NPM) and post-NPM. European Political Science Review, 3(1), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773910000299
Dan, S., & Pollitt, C. (2015). NPM Can Work: An optimistic review of the impact of New Public Management reforms in central and eastern Europe. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1305–1332. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.908662
Debicki, M., & Debicka, A. J. (2008). Public management reforms: Poland. In G. Bouckaert (Ed.), Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 245–267). NISPAcee Press.
Dencik, L. (2022). The Datafied Welfare State: A Perspective from the UK. In A. Hepp, J. Jarke, & L. Kramp (Eds.), New Perspectives in Critical Data Studies (pp. 145–165). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96180-0_7
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed). The University of Chicago Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1996). Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216941
Esping-Andersen, G. (2003). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198742002.001.0001
Eubanks, V. (2017). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor (First Edition). St. Martin’s Press.
European Commission. Statistical Office of the European Union. (2020). Ageing Europe: Looking at the lives of older people in the EU : 2020 edition. Publications Office. [link]
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Frączkiewicz-Wronka, A., Kozak, A., & Szymaniec-Mlicka, K. (2024). Digitization of social welfare entities and its importance for the effective implementation of social services in the public management system. Social Entrepreneurship Review, 2, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.15678/SER.2024.2.02
Gantchev, V. (2019). Data protection in the age of welfare conditionality: Respect for basic rights or a race to the bottom? European Journal of Social Security, 21(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1388262719838109
Golinowska, S. (2009a). New challenges for the future and the response of the European Union in the context of the European Social Model. In S. Golinowska, P. Hengstenberg, & M. Żukowski (Eds.), Diversity and commonality in European social policies: The forging of a European social model (pp. 379–420). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar : Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
Golinowska, S. (2009b). The national model of the welfare state in Poland. Tradition and changes. In S. Golinowska, P. Hengstenberg, & M. Żukowski (Eds.), Diversity and commonality in European social policies: The forging of a European social model (pp. 213–260). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar : Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
Golinowska, S. (2018). Modele polityki społecznej w Polsce i Europie na początku XXI wieku. Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego.
Golinowska, S., Hengstenberg, P., & Żukowski, M. (Eds.). (2009). Diversity and commonality in European social policies: The forging of a European social model. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar : Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
Gruening, G. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of new public management. International Public Management Journal, 4(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7494(01)00041-1
Hood, C. (1991). A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
Howard, C. (2015). Rethinking Post-NPM Governance: The Bureaucratic Struggle to Implement One-Stop-Shopping for Government Services in Alberta. Public Organization Review, 15(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-014-0272-0
Kempeneer, S. (2023). What is New About the New Public Analytics? Unpacking the New Public Management Causes of Algorithmic Injustice. Tilburg Law Review, 27(2), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.5334/tilr.304
Kinder, T. (2012). Learning, Innovating and Performance in Post-New Public Management of Locally Delivered Public Services. Public Management Review, 14(3), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.637408
Księżopolski, M. (2011). Dokąd zmierza polityka społeczna w Polsce? Problemy Polityki Społecznej: studia i dyskusje., 16. [link]
Księżopolski, M. (2013). Between guarantees of communism and a paternalistic-market hybrid: Polish social policy at the turn of the 20th century. Economics and Business Review, 13(3), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2013.3.670
Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy. (2019). Social assistance. [link]
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy (First edition). Crown.
Parker, L., & Gould, G. (1999). Changing public sector accountability: Critiquing new directions. Accounting Forum, 23(2), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6303.00007
Rae, G., & Piotrowska, K. (2022). Mixed opinions: Public attitudes towards the welfare state in Poland. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 84(4), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2022.84.4.09
Randma-Liiv, T. (n.d.). New Public Management versus Neo-Weberian State in Central and Eastern Europe.
Randma-Liiv, T., & Drechsler, W. (2017). Three decades, four phases: Public administration development in Central and Eastern Europe, 1989-2017. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(6–7), 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2017-0175
Rusiecka, A. (2023). Social security in Poland (2023). ZUS. [link]
Samier, E. (2005). Toward a Weberian Public Administration: The Infinite Web of History, Values, and Authority in Administrative Mentalities”. Halduskultuur, 6, 60–94.
Siemieńska, R., & Domaradzka, A. (2016). Between Constrained Opportunities and Social Expectations: Social Policy in Contemporary Poland. In K. Schubert, P. De Villota, & J. Kuhlmann (Eds.), Challenges to European Welfare Systems (pp. 563–586). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07680-5
Siemieńska, R., & Domaradzka, A. (2020). Politics of Welfare: The Polish Welfare System in the First Decades of the 21st Century. In S. Blum, J. Kuhlmann, & K. Schubert (Eds.), Routledge handbook of European welfare systems (Second edition, pp. 404–423). Routledge.
Sosnowski, S., Gędek, W., Szelewa, D., & Theiss, M. (2021). The Bifurcated System of Social Assistance in Poland: Personal Relations of (Dis)Trust and Impersonal Bureaucratic Institutions. In M. Theiss & D. Szelewa (Eds.), Integrated Report on Trust and Distrust at the Street-level of Public Policy. [link]
Stachura, J., & Strzelecki, P. (2023). 2024 Ageing Report. Poland—Country Fiche. Economic Policy Committee - Ageing Working Group. [link]
Szarfenberg, R. (2021). Centra usług społecznych – czy poprawią dostęp do usług społecznych i ich jakość? (Forum Idei). Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego.
Titmuss, R. M., & Abel-Smith, B. (1990). Social policy: An introduction (6. impr). Unwin Hyman.
Trochymiak, M. (2018). Uznaniowość w pomocy społecznej. Działania pracowników socjalnych w świetle koncepcji street-level bureaucracy. Polityka Społeczna, 9, 12–19.
Ustawa z Dnia 12 Marca 2004 r. o Pomocy Społecznej, Pub. L. No. Dz.U. 2004 nr 64 poz. 593 (2004). [link]
Widner, J., Woolcock, M., & Ortega Nieto, D. (Eds.). (2022). The Case for Case Studies: Methods and Applications in International Development (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108688253
Wyszkowska, D., Gabińska, M., & Romańska, S. (2024). The situation of older people in Poland in 2023 (Statistical Analyses). Statistics Poland (GUS). [link]
Yeung, K. (2023). The New Public Analytics as an Emerging Paradigm in Public Sector Administration. Tilburg Law Review, 27(2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.5334/tilr.303
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sebastian Sosnowski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
