Exploring generative AI effects on Korean civil servants’ performance
Power and motivation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.1032Keywords:
Generative Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Reinforcement Theory, Extrinsic Motivation, Intrinsic Motivation, Civil ServantAbstract
This study explores the factors influencing civil servants’ perceptions of generative AI-assisted work performance, focusing on extrinsic and intrinsic motivations and the moderating role of organizational power, as measured by government level and organizational rank. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as one of the most influential technologies, driving transformation in both government and society. Generative AI, as a subfield of AI, has gained recognition for its capabilities to automate routine tasks, enhance decision-making, and improve work productivity. However, little is known about who perceives the positive effects of these tools on performance and why. Drawing on the notion that motivations affect work performance and the reinforcement politics model, this study analyzes survey data from 1,608 Korean civil servants collected by the Korean Institute of Public Administration (KIPA) in April 2023, when generative AI was still in its early stages of development. The survey targeted civil servants from central, provincial, and local governments to gauge their perspectives on generative AI-assisted work performance. This study employed partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), an appropriate method for predictive modeling and identifying key driving factors in complex relationships to investigate the connection between two types of motivation and perceived work performance. The findings reveal that extrinsic and intrinsic motivations positively influence perceived work performance, with intrinsic motivation having a more substantial effect. Also, extrinsic motivation significantly enhances intrinsic motivation, highlighting the dynamic interaction between the two constructs. However, the moderating effects of government level and organizational rank on the relationship between motivations and perceived work performance were not statistically significant. These results underscore the critical role of individual motivation in shaping perceptions of generative AI tools while suggesting that organizational power may play a less significant role in this context than previously anticipated. Theoretically, this study provides empirical evidence supporting the idea that motivations affect work performance by demonstrating the effectiveness of generative AI tools in public administration while challenging the reinforcement politics model. It challenges the foundational assumption of the model that organizational power makes a significant impact on the adoption and effectiveness of generative AI tools.
Downloads
References
Abdullatif, T. N., bt Johari, H., & bt Adnan, Z. (2016). The influence of extrinsic motivation on innovative work behaviour with moderating role of quality culture. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 2(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.26710/jbsee.v2i1.21
Al Naqbi, H., Bahroun, Z., & Ahmed, V. (2024). Enhancing work productivity through generative artificial intelligence: A comprehensive literature review. Sustainability, 16(3), 1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031166
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950–967. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950
Androniceanu, A. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence, present and perspectives in public administration. Administration & Public Management Review, (43). https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2024.43-06
Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: a motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x
Backlinko. (2024). ChatGPT stats: Usage, adoption trends, and key facts. Retrieved November 28, 2024, from [link]
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 421-458. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203
Banh, L., & Strobel, G. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence. Electronic Markets, 33(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00680-1
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021, March). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 610-623). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Birch, K., & Bronson, K. (2022). Big tech. Science as Culture, 31(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2022.2036118
Bishop, J. (1987). The recognition and reward of employee performance. Journal of Labor Economics, 5(4, Part 2), S36-S56. https://doi.org/10.1086/298164
Bloch-Wehba, H. (2021). Transparency's AI problem. Knight First Amendment Institute. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from [link]
Boston Consulting Group, (2024). Generative AI for the Public Sector: The Journey to Scale. Retrieved January 8, 2025, from [link]
Boyd, M., & Wilson, N. (2017). Rapid developments in artificial intelligence: How might the New Zealand government respond?. Policy Quarterly, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v13i4.4619
Bright, J., Enock, F. E., Esnaashari, S., Francis, J., Hashem, Y., & Morgan, D. (2024). Generative AI is already widespread in the public sector. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01291. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.01291
Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017). What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science, 358(6370), 1530-1534. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8062
Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2023). Generative AI at Work. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 31161. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31161
Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., Aguinis, H., Bamber, G. J., Beltran, J. R., ... & Varma, A. (2023). Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(3), 606-659. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12524
Burkhardt, M. E., & Brass, D. J. (1990). Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 104-127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393552
Castro, D., & New, J. (2016). The promise of artificial intelligence. Center for Data Innovation, 115(10), 32-35. Retrieved June 8, 2018, from [link]
Chelmis, C., & Prasanna, V. K. (2013, August). The role of organization hierarchy in technology adoption at the workplace. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (pp. 8-15). https://doi.org/10.1145/2492517.2492566
Chintalloo, S., & Mahadeo, J. (2013, July). Effect of motivation on employees’ work performance at Ireland Blyth Limited. In Proceedings of 8th Annual London Business Research Conference Imperial College, London, UK (Vol. 8, p. 9).
Ciobanu, A., & Androniceanu, A. (2015). Civil servants motivation and work performance in Romanian public institutions. Procedia Economics and Finance, 30, 164-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01280-0
Council of the European Union. (2023). ChatGPT in the public sector: Overhyped or overlooked? Brussels: General Secretariat of the Council. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from [link]
Criado, J. I., Valero, J., & Villodre, J. (2020). Algorithmic transparency and bureaucratic discretion: The case of SALER early warning system. Information Polity, 25(4), 449-470. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-200260
Dasborough, M. T. (2023). Awe-inspiring advancements in AI: The impact of ChatGPT on the field of Organizational Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 44(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2695
De Cremer, D., Bianzino, N. M., & Falk, B. (2023). How generative AI could disrupt creative work. Harvard Business Review, 13.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 930-942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201278002
Dell'Acqua, F., McFowland III, E., Mollick, E. R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Kellogg, K., Rajendran, S., ... & Lakhani, K. R. (2023). Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt. Unit Working Paper, (24-013). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4573321
Diefendorff, J. M., & Chandler, M. M. (2011). Motivating employees. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 3. Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 65–135). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12171-003
Erkkilä, T. (2020). Transparency in public administration. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1404
Faisal, F., Wang, Y., & Anastasopoulos, A. (2021). Dataset geography: Mapping language data to language users. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.03497. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.03497
Fauzi, F., Tuhuteru, L., Sampe, F., Ausat, A. M. A., & Hatta, H. R. (2023). Analysing the role of ChatGPT in improving student productivity in higher education. Journal on Education, 5(4), 14886-14891. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2563
Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2024). Generative ai. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
Gaurav, B., Queirolo, A., & Santhanam, N. (2018). Artificial intelligence: The time to act is now. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from [link]
Gmyrek, P., Berg, J., & Bescond, D. (2023). Generative AI and jobs: A global analysis of potential effects on job quantity and quality. ILO working paper, 96. https://doi.org/10.54394/FHEM8239
Goldman Sachs Global Institute. (2023). The generative world order: AI, geopolitics, and power. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from [link]
Goldstein, J. (2023). New IBM study reveals how AI is changing work and what HR leaders should do about it. Retrieved from December 29, 2024, from [link]
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
Hadi, M. U., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Irfan, M., Zafar, A., Shaikh, M. B., ... & Mirjalili, S. (2023). A survey on large language models: Applications, challenges, limitations, and practical usage. Authorea Preprints, 3. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.23589741.v1
Hair Jr, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
Heintze, T., & Bretschneider, S. (2000). Information technology and restructuring in public organizations: Does adoption of information technology affect organizational structures, communications, and decision making?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 801-830. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024292
Herzberg, F. (1959). The motivation to work. John Wiley & Sons.
Hoffmann, M., Boysel, S., Nagle, F., Peng, S., & Xu, K. (2024). Generative AI and the Nature of Work (CESifo Working Paper No. 11479). CESifo. [link]
Jebara, T. (2004). Generative versus discriminative learning. In Machine learning: Discriminative and generative (pp. 17-60). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9011-2_2
Jon (Sean) Jasperson, Carte, T. A., Saunders, C. S., Butler, B. S., Croes, H. J., & Zheng, W. (2002). Power and information technology research: A meta triangulation review. MIS Quarterly, 397-459. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132315
Jullien, B., & Sand-Zantman, W. (2021). The economics of platforms: A theory guide for competition policy. Information Economics and Policy, 54, 100880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2020.100880
Khanal, S., Zhang, H., & Taeihagh, A. (2024). Why and how is the power of Big Tech increasing in the policy process? The case of generative AI. Policy and Society, puae012. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae012
Kim, M., & Chung, S. (2021). Analysis of the utilization of digital technology on organization performance of the government: Focusing on public officials’ perception. Korean Society and Public Administration, 32(2), 85–111. https://doi.org/10.53865/KSPA.2021.08.32.2.85
Kraemer, K. L., & Dedrick, J. (1997). Computing and public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), 89-112. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024344
Kraemer, K. L., & King, J. L. (1986). Computing and public organizations. Public Administration Review, 488-496. https://doi.org/10.2307/975570
Kraemer, K., & King, J. L. (2006). Information technology and administrative reform: Will e-government be different?. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 2(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2006010101
Kumar, T. V. (2024). Developments and uses of generative artificial intelligence and present experimental data on the impact on productivity applying artificial intelligence that is generative. International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, 12(10), 2382–2388. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJAREEIE.2022.1210015
Landsberger, H. A. (1968). Counseling in an Organization: A Sequel to the Hawthorne Researches.
Latif, F., Jalal, W., Anjum, R., & Rizwan, M. (2014). The impact of rewards & corporate social responsibility (CSR) on employee motivation. International Journal of Human Resource Studies ISSN 2162-3058 2014, 4(3), 70-86. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v4i3.5875
Lee, J. (2008). Determinants of government bureaucrats' new PMIS adoption: The role of organizational power, IT capability, administrative role, and attitude. The American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 180-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074007304386
Lehmann, F., & Buschek, D. (2020). Examining autocompletion as a basic concept for interaction with generative AI. i-com, 19(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2020-0025
Madan, R., & Ashok, M. (2022). A public values perspective on the application of Artificial Intelligence in government practices: A Synthesis of case studies. In Handbook of research on artificial intelligence in government practices and processes (pp. 162-189). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9609-8.ch010
Malhotra, A., Sharma, A., Sharma, D., & Ahmed, F. (2021). Résumé builder over rejuvenated AI features in website development. In M. A. Khan, S. Gairola, B. Jha, & P. Praveen (Eds.), Smart Computing (pp. 519–525). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003167488-62
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
Mayo, E. (1949). Hawthorne and the Western Electric Company. The social problems of an industrial civilization, 1-7.
McGregor, D. M. (2002). 19 THEORY X AND Y. The Motivation Handbook, 142.
Moran, C. M., Diefendorff, J. M., Kim, T. Y., & Liu, Z. Q. (2012). A profile approach to self-determination theory motivations at work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(3), 354-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.09.002
Morshidi, A., Zakaria, N. S., Idris, R. Z., Ridzuan, M. I. M., & Yusoff, S. M. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence and Risk at Work: An Inevitable Consequence?. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 5(4), 329-343. https://doi.org/10.55057/ajress.2023.5.4.33
Nakavachara, V., Potipiti, T., & Chaiwat, T. (2024). Experimenting with Generative AI: Does ChatGPT Really Increase Everyone's Productivity?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01770. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.01770
Noonpakdee, W. (2024). User Adoption of Generative AI for Government Information Services in Thailand. Rajapark Journal, 18(60), 1-20.
Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381(6654), 187-192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586
Peng, S., Kalliamvakou, E., Cihon, P., & Demirer, M. (2023). The impact of ai on developer productivity: Evidence from github copilot. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06590. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.06590
Perry, J. L., & Rainey, H. G. (1988). The public-private distinction in organization theory: A critique and research strategy. Academy of management review, 13(2), 182-201. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306858
Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. L. (1993). The impact of information technology on middle managers. Mis Quarterly, 271-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/249772
Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. L. (1997). Middle management downsizing: An empirical investigation of the impact of information technology. Management science, 43(5), 659-679. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.5.659
Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., & Sutskever, I. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog, 1(8), 9. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from [link]
Rana, N. P., Pillai, R., Sivathanu, B., & Malik, N. (2024). Assessing the nexus of Generative AI adoption, ethical considerations and organizational performance. Technovation, 135, 103064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103064
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
Ringle, C.M., Wende, S. and Becker, J-M. (2015) SmartPLS 3, SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt, No. 31. Retrieved December 20, 2024, from [link]
Ruthotto, L., & Haber, E. (2021). An introduction to deep generative modeling. GAMM-Mitteilungen, 44(2), e202100008. https://doi.org/10.1002/gamm.202100008
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Salah, M., Abdelfattah, F., & Al Halbusi, H. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (ChatGPT & Bard) in public administration research: A double-edged sword for street-level bureaucracy studies. International Journal of Public Administration, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2023.2274801
Schramowski, P., Turan, C., Andersen, N., Rothkopf, C. A., & Kersting, K. (2022). Large pre-trained language models contain human-like biases of what is right and wrong to do. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4(3), 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00458-8
Sharon, T., & Gellert, R. (2024). Regulating Big Tech expansionism? Sphere transgressions and the limits of Europe’s digital regulatory strategy. Information, Communication & Society, 27(15), 2651-2668. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2246526
Taylor, F. W. (1919). The principles of scientific management. Harper & brothers.
Tomczak, J. M. (2024). Why deep generative modeling?. In Deep Generative Modeling (pp. 1-13). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64087-2_1
Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C. H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195-1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058
Viechnicki, P., & Eggers, W. (2017). How much time and money can AI save government? Deloitte Center for Government Insights. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from [link]
Weinberg, R. S., & Gould, D. (2023). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. Human kinetics.
Weisz, J. D., Muller, M., He, J., & Houde, S. (2023). Toward general design principles for generative AI applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.05578. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.05578
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector—applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
Wörsdörfer, M. (2022). What happened to ‘Big Tech’and antitrust? And how to fix them!. Philosophy of Management, 21(3), 345-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-022-00193-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sukwon Choi, Wookjoon Sung, Jooho Lee
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
