Wind of Change or Just Another Digitalization Breeze?

Lessons from Municipal Digital Change Agent Initiatives

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.1030

Keywords:

Digital Transformation, Internal Change Agents, Public Administration, Municipalities, E-government

Abstract

Digital transformation (DT) is a critical challenge for public administration, requiring municipalities to modernize services while overcoming bureaucratic inertia and workforce resistance. Hence, many German states have recently invested in municipal digital change agent (MDCA) initiatives (kommunale Digitallotseninitiativen) to facilitate and accelerate the DT process within municipalities. However, the effectiveness of such initiatives remains underexplored, as public sector constraints differ from those in private organizations, and due to their novelty. This study adopts a case study design using interviews and document analyses to examine the effectiveness and potential of MDCA initiatives. The findings indicate that the success of digital change agents is contingent on clearly defined roles, effective communication strategies, and adequate resource support. The findings highlight key drivers of success, including digital capabilities, appointing dedicated digitalization staff, fostering proactive employee initiatives, participatory leadership, proactive communication, (re)building trust, and personal benefits. However, several challenges impede MDCA’s effectiveness, such as unclear role definitions, insufficient training, lack of assigned responsibilities and communication, resource scarcity, and inadequate leadership support. Structural obstacles, such as low prioritization of digitalization, absence of incentives, and resistance from tenured employees, further restrict progress. The study derives four propositions regarding the effectiveness of MDCA initiatives and DT enhancement in public administration: Clearly defining the MDCA role and responsibilities, assigning DT responsibilities to managers, increasing visibility and prioritization of DT, and introducing incentive mechanisms to foster engagement. These insights contribute to the literature on DT and change management in public administration, highlighting the need for structured frameworks and accountability measures. While MDCAs can act as catalysts for digital change, their effectiveness depends on strategic alignment, leadership commitment, and adequate resource allocation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angehrn, A. A., & Atherton, J. E. M. (1999). A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Development Programmes for Change Agents. Centre for Advanced Learning Technologies, INSEAD.

Armenakis, A. A., & Fredenberger, W. B. (1997). Organizational change readiness practices of business turnaround change agents. Knowledge and Process Management, 4(3), 143–152.

Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating Readiness for Organizational Change. Human Relations, 46(6).

Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119–128.

Battilana, J., & Casciaro, T. (2013). Overcoming Resistance to Organizational Change: Strong Ties and Affective Cooptation. Management Science, 59(4), 819–836.

Buick, F., Blackman, D., & Johnson, S. (2018). Enabling Middle Managers as Change Agents: Why Organisational Support Needs to Change. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(2), 222–235.

Bünnagel, W. (2021). Mitarbeiter als Change Agents. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Caldwell, R. (2003). Models of Change Agency: a Fourfold Classification. British Journal of Management, 14(2), 131–142.

Choi, M. (2011). Employees' attitudes toward organizational change: A literature review. Human Resource Management, 50(4), 479–500.

Czernich, N., Falck, O., Pfaf, C., Ruthardt, F., & Wölfl, A. (2021). Benchmarking Digitalisierung in Deutschland. ifo Institut.

Eggers, W. D., & Bellman, J. (2015). The journey to government’s digital transformation (Deloitte University Press).

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 543–576. [link]

Endrejat, P. C., Klonek, F. E., Müller-Frommeyer, L. C., & Kauffeld, S. (2021). Turning change resistance into readiness: How change agents’ communication shapes recipient reactions. European Management Journal, 39(5), 595–604.

Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Managing Successful Organizational Change in the Public Sector. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 168–176.

Fischer, C., & Breaugh, J. (2024). Digitallotsen in der Verwaltung.

Ford, Jeffrey D., Ford, Laurie W., & d'Amelio, A. (2008). Resistance to Change: The Rest of the Story, 33(2), 362–377.

Furnham, A. (2002). Managers as change agents. Journal of Change Management, 3(1), 21–29.

Gilli, K., Lettner, N., & Guettel, W. (2024). The future of leadership: new digital skills or old analog virtues? Journal of Business Strategy, 45(1), 10–16.

Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.

Gong, Y., Yang, J., & Shi, X. (2020). Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital transformation in government: Analysis of flexibility and enterprise architecture. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101487.

Hameed, I [Imran], Khan, A. K., Sabharwal, M., Arain, G. A., & Hameed, I [Irfan] (2019). Managing Successful Change Efforts in the Public Sector: An Employee’s Readiness for Change Perspective. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(3), 398–421.

Hansen, M. B., & Nørup, I. (2017). Leading the Implementation of ICT Innovations. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 851–860.

Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024). Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 26(7), 1963–1987.

Hemme, F., Bowers, M. T., & Todd, J. S. (2018). Change readiness as fluid trajectories: a longitudinal multiple-case study. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(5), 1153–1175.

Heuberger, M. (2020). Digitaler Organisationswandel. In T. Klenk, F. Nullmeier, & G. Wewer (Eds.), Handbuch Digitalisierung in Staat und Verwaltung (pp. 1–12). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

Jahn, S., Avigur-Wigand, R., Krcmar, H., Daßler, L., Jäger, I., Paul, L., & Pleger, S. (2024). eGovernment MONITOR 2024: Nutzung und Akzeptans digitaler Verwaltungsdienstleistungen aus Sicht der Bürger*innen. Die deutschen Bundesländer, Deutschland, Österreich und die Schweiz im Vergleich. Initiative D21. [link]

Kickert, W. J. (2010). Managing emergent and complex change: the case of Dutch agencification. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), 489–515.

Kuhlmann, S., & Heuberger, M. (2023). Digital transformation going local: implementation, impacts and constraints from a German perspective. Public Money & Management, 43(2), 147–155.

Kuipers, B. S., Higgs, M., KICKERT, W., Tummers, L., Grandina, J., & van der VOET, J. (2014). The Management of Change in Public Organizaitons: A Literature Review. Public Administration, 92(1), 1–20.

Kuntz, J. R., & Gomes, J. F. (2012). Transformational change in organisations: a self-regulation approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(1), 143–162.

Kussel, G., Pavleka, S., & Schmidt, C. M. (2024). Innovationssystem Deutschland - Effizienz und Agilität der öffentlichen Verwaltung erhöhen. acatech – Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften.

Lekkas, C.‑K., & Souitaris, V. (2023). Bureaucracy Meets Digital Reality: The unfolding of urban platforms in European municipal governments. Organization Studies, 44(10), 1649–1678.

Markus, H., & Meuche, T. (2022). Auf dem Weg zur digitalen Verwaltung. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Markus, M. L., & Benjamin, R. I. (1996). Change Agentry - The Next IS Frontier. MIS Quarterly, 20(4), 385–407.

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385.

Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value Strategic: Management in Government.

Moser-Plautz, B. (2024). Barriers to digital government and the COVID-19 crisis – A comparative study of federal government entities in the United States and Austria. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90(2), 402–418.

Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2–26.

Ndou, V. (2004). E – Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges. THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL of INFORMATION SYSTEMS in DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 18(1), 1–24.

Pádár, K., Pataki, B., & Sebestyén, Z. (2017). Bringing project and change management roles into sync. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(5), 797–822.

Parke, M. R., Tangirala, S., & Hussain, I. (2021). Creating organizational citizens: How and when supervisor- versus peer-led role interventions change organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(11), 1714–1733.

Parry, W., Kirsch, C., Carey, P., & Shaw, D. (2014). Empirical Development of a Model of Performance Drivers in Organizational Change Projects. Journal of Change Management, 14(1), 99–125.

Pittaway, J. J., & Montazemi, A. R. (2020). Know-how to lead digital transformation: The case of local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101474.

Ritchie, F. (2014). Resistance to change in government: risk, inertia and incentives (Economics Working Paper Series).

Segura-Tinoco, A., Holgado-Sánchez, A., Cantador, I., Cortés-Cediel, M. E., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2020). A Conversational Agent for Argument-driven E-participation.

Specht, J., Kuonath, A., Pachler, D., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2018). How Change Agents’ Motivation Facilitates Organizational Change: Pathways Through Meaning and Organizational Identification. Journal of Change Management, 18(3), 198–217.

Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021). Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102356.

Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178.

van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (2014). Explaining Development and Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3).

van de Voet, J. (2014). The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure. European Management Journal, 32(3), 373–382.

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144.

Westover, J. H. (2010). Managing Organizational Change: Change Agent Strategies and Techniques to Successfully Managing the Dynamics of Stability and Change in Organizations. International Journal of Management and Innovation, 2(1).

Winners, C. (2020). Fit für den digitalen Wandel in Kommunen. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

Wylie, N., & Sturdy, A. (2018). Structuring collective change agency internally. Employee Relations, 40(2), 313–328.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-23

How to Cite

Jäger, I., Hein, A., & Krcmar, H. (2025). Wind of Change or Just Another Digitalization Breeze? Lessons from Municipal Digital Change Agent Initiatives. Conference on Digital Government Research, 26. https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.1030

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Research papers