Converging Paths?
Co-creation practices in public services in Poland and Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.1017Keywords:
Public sector, co-creation, public services, institutionalizationAbstract
This study investigates how co-creation is being institutionalized in public service delivery in Poland and Ukraine, focusing on six domains of citizen involvement: legislative frameworks, digital platforms, public consultations, civic monitoring, local initiatives, and civic education. These neighboring countries, connected through shared regional initiatives but shaped by differing political, administrative, and civic trajectories, offer a compelling basis for comparative analysis. While both have made strides in adopting participatory practices, Poland tends to follow a more structured, policy-aligned approach, whereas Ukraine exhibits dynamic, bottom-up developments driven by ongoing decentralization reforms. Our findings indicate that co-creation is becoming more systematically integrated into governance structures, although institutionalization remains uneven across domains and administrative levels. Key challenges include institutional fragmentation, limited translation of public input into policy outcomes, and underdeveloped interdisciplinary competencies, particularly in light of digital transformation and the growing role of AI. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for strengthening co-creation ecosystems in both countries.
Downloads
References
A conscious citizen program. (2023). [link]
Association of Ukrainian Cities. (2023). [link]
Ciepielewska-Kowalik, A. (2024a). Between constraint co-production and real co-creation of public services: citizen involvement as public service innovation. Lessons from Poland. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 33(1), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2024.2363872
Ciepielewska-Kowalik, A. (2024b). Between constraint co-production and real co-creation of public services: citizen involvement as public service innovation. Lessons from Poland. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 33(1), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2024.2363872
Concept of the Development of e-Governance in Ukraine (Issue Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine №649-р). (2017).
Decentralization. International support. (2023). [link]
Edelmann, N., & Mureddu, F. (2023). Public Policies for Digital Co-Creation in Public Services. In In Elgar Encyclopedia of Services. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
E-Governance platform. (2023). [link]
Interreg NEXT Poland – Ukraine 2021-2027. (2023). [link]
Keudel, O., & Huss, O. (2024). Polycentric governance in practice: the case of Ukraine’s decentralised crisis response during the Russo-Ukrainian war. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 39(1), 10–35. https://doi.org/10.1332/25156918Y2023D000000002
Khutkyy, D., & Matveieva, O. (2024). Sustainable Development, Digital Democracy, and Open Government: Co-Creation Synergy in Ukraine. Comparative Southeast European Studies, 72(4), 436–464. https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2024-0036
Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine. (2023a). Diia Platform. [link]
Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine. (2023b). Mobile Application Diia. [link]
Ministry of Digitalization. (2023). Ukraine and Poland signed a memorandum of understanding on cooperation in the field of digitalization. [link]
Ministry of Family, Labor and Social Policy. (2023). [link]
Mobile application mObywatel. (2023). [link]
Mureddu, F., & Osimo, D. (2020). CO-CREATION OF PUBLIC SERVICES Why and How? European Review of Service Economics and Management, 1, 177–200.
Order on the principles of conducting public consultations of documents developed in the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy (Issue №2). (2014).
Platform “Public Budget” (DEM). (2023). [link]
Poland. (1990). Law of Poland on Municipal Government (Issue №16 poz. 958).
Poland. (2001). Law of Poland on Access to Public Information (Issue №112 item 1198).
Poland. (2018). Government Program for Promoting the Development of Civil Society Organizations for 2018–2030 (GDP) (Issue Resolution №104/2018).
Polish public services portal Gov.pl. (2023). [link]
Portal for entrepreneurs. (2023). [link]
Portal mObywatel. (2023). [link]
Public hearings of the Kyiv City Council. (2023). [link]
Public Services Monitoring System. (2023). [link]
Public services portal iGov. (2023). [link]
Rizun, N., Revina, A., & Edelmann, N. (2025). Text analytics for co-creation in public sector organizations: a literature review-based research framework. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(4), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11112-1
Rodriguez Müller, A. P., Flores, C. C., Albrecht, V., Steen, T., & Crompvoets, J. (2021). A scoping review of empirical evidence on (Digital) public services co-creation. Administrative Sciences, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040130
State Geocadastre. (2023). [link]
Szarek-Iwaniuk, P., & Senetra, A. (2020). Access to ICT in Poland and the Co-Creation of Urban Space in the Process of Modern Social Participation in a Smart City—A Case Study. Sustainability, 12(5), 2136. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052136
The ABCs of civic participation. (2023). [link]
Ukraine. (1996). Law of Ukraine on Citizens’ Appeals (Issue №393/96-ВР).
Ukraine. (1997a). Law of Ukraine on Local Self-Government in Ukraine (Issue №280/97-ВР).
Ukraine. (1997b). Law of Ukraine on Local Self-Government in Ukraine (Issue №280/97-ВР).
Ukraine. (2011). Law of Ukraine on Access to Public Information (Issue №2939-VI).
United Nations e-Government Knowledgebase. (2023). [link]
What is a local initiative? (2023). [link]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yuliia Bartashevska, Nina Rizun, Hanna Bondarovych, Nina Khairova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
