Digital technologies and partnerships for Sustainable Development Goals
A document analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.1004Keywords:
United Nations, Sustainable Development Goals, Digital Technologies, Technological Partnerships, Governmental Partnerships, Social Innovation Ecosystems, Document AnalysisAbstract
Digital governance is a central concern in global efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The United Nations (UN) emphasizes the potential of digital technologies and technological partnerships to address global challenges, while governments struggle to develop technology governance policies at a pace that keeps up with technological advancements. Problem: despite growing recognition of digital technologies and technological partnerships as key enablers of sustainable development, there is limited understanding of how they could be more effectively leveraged by governmental and non-governmental organizations to advance the SDGs. Approach: This study examines how the UN envisions the role of digital
technologies and technological partnerships in advancing the SDGs and analyses these findings through the lens of Social Innovation Ecosystems (SIEs). Methods: A qualitative document analysis was conducted on six official UN documents (2022–2024) addressing digital technologies and technological partnerships in the SDGs context. Thematic and reflexive analysis was applied with iterative coding. Main results: Findings highlight priority issues such as AI regulation for child protection, ethical and inclusive AI governance, counterterrorism, and efforts to reduce digital inequality. Four thematic categories were generated, and analysis also reveals a dual focus: centralized governance and stringent regulation of emerging technologies — particularly AI — alongside a call for international cooperation, ecosystem-like partnerships, public digital goods, and open models. Conclusions: Some UN priorities present tensions, as strict governance structures may hinder the agility required for open collaboration, and vice versa. SIEs approach may offer a potential balance, enabling governments, corporations, academia, and civil society to co-create solutions, share resources, and scale social innovations while ensuring technological development and adoption aligns with human rights, digital equity, and the SDGs.
Downloads
References
Albuquerque, B. V. L., & Siqueira, S. W. M. (2025). Digital technologies and information systems in social innovation ecosystems. Proceedings of the XXI Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação, Brasil, 798-807. Porto Alegre, SBC. https://doi.org/10.5753/sbsi.2025.246647
Beckman, C., Rosen, J., Estrada, J., & Painter, G. (2023). The social innovation trap: Critical insights into an emerging field. Academy of Management Annals, 17(2), 684–709. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2021.0089
Bucio-Mendoza, S., & Solis-Navarrete, J. A. (2024). Institutionalising social innovation in the Global South: Lessons learned. Heliyon, 10(20), Article e39556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39556
Chaudhuri, R., Chatterjee, S., Mariani, M., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2024). Assessing the influence of emerging technologies on organizational data driven culture and innovation capabilities: A sustainability performance perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123165
Chueri, L., Afonso, A., Pinheiro, M., Ramos, M., & dos Santos, R. P. (2020). Um estudo exploratório sobre plataformas digitais para ecossistemas de inovação social no Brasil. Proceedings of the V Workshop sobre aspectos sociais, humanos e econômicos de software, Brasil, 81-90. https://doi.org/10.5753/washes.2020.11200
Ho, J.-Y., Yoon, S. (2022). Ambiguous roles of intermediaries in social entrepreneurship: The case of social innovation system in South Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121324
Hu, M.-C., Phillips, F., & Wu, C.-Y. (2024). Social innovations mediate technology and economy in the Kondratieff waves. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123262
Lu, X., & Wang, J. (2024). Is innovation strategy a catalyst to solve social problems? The impact of R&D and non-R&D innovation strategies on the performance of social innovation-oriented firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123020
Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., Saura, J. R., & Barbosa, B. (2024). How do e-governance and e-business drive sustainable development goals? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123082
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications. ISBN9781452257877
Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
Office of the Secretary-General (2022). Implementing the Secretary-General’s Roadmap for Digital Cooperation (July 2022 update). United Nations. [link]
Parthasarathy, B., Dey, S., & Gupta, P. (2021). Overcoming wicked problems and institutional voids for social innovation: University-NGO partnerships in the Global South. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121104
Pel, B., Wittmayer, J., Dorland, J., & Jørgensen, M. (2019). Unpacking the social innovation ecosystem: An empirically grounded typology of empowering network constellations. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 33(3), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2019.1705147
Phills Jr., J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.48558/GBJY-GJ47
Pinheiro, M., Chueri, L., & Santos , R. (2021). Investigando Colaboração em Ecossistemas. Proceedings of the VI Workshop sobre Aspectos Sociais, Humanos e Econômicos de Software, Brasil, 11-20. Porto Alegre: SBC. https://doi.org/10.5753/washes.2021.15885
Slitine, R., Chabaud, D., & Richez-Battesti, N. (2024). Towards local sustainability: How intermediation fosters social innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123790
Soni, G., Mangla, S. K., Singh, P., Dey, B. L., & Dora, M. (2021). Technological interventions in social business: Mapping current research and establishing future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120818
United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (Resolution A/RES/70/1, General Assembly, 25 September 2015). United Nations. [link]
United Nations (2024). Pact for the Future, Global Digital Compact, and Declaration on Future Generations (Summit for the Future outcome documents, Resolution A/RES/79/1, September 2024). United Nations. [link]
United Nations AI Advisory Board (2024). Governing AI for humanity: final report (September 2024). United Nations. [link]
United Nations Economic and Social Council (2024). Science, technology and innovation for development (Resolution E/RES/2024/14, July 2024). United Nations. [link]
United Nations General Assembly. (2024). Letter from the President of the General Assembly. 20 September 2024. United Nations. [link]
United Nations Trade and Development (2023). Technology and innovation report 2023. United Nations. [link]
Wamba, S. F., Bawack, R. E., Guthrie, C., Queiroz, M. M., & Carillo, K. D. A. (2021). Are we preparing for a good AI society? A bibliometric review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120482
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Beatriz Ventorini Lins de Albuquerque, Sean Wolfgand Matsui Siqueira, Paulo Sérgio Medeiros dos Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
